Get Our e-AlertsSubmit Manuscript
Energy Material Advances / 2022 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 |Article ID 9842610 |

Xin Wan, Yingjie Song, Hua Zhou, Mingfei Shao, "Layered Double Hydroxides for Oxygen Evolution Reaction towards Efficient Hydrogen Generation", Energy Material Advances, vol. 2022, Article ID 9842610, 17 pages, 2022.

Layered Double Hydroxides for Oxygen Evolution Reaction towards Efficient Hydrogen Generation

Received30 Jun 2022
Accepted09 Aug 2022
Published07 Sep 2022


Electrochemical water splitting is one of the effective ways to obtain highly pure hydrogen. However, as one of the two half reactions, oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has a high overpotential, resulting in the low-energy utilization efficiency. Therefore, numerous electrocatalysts have been developed to reduce the energy barrier of OER. Among them, layered double hydroxides (LDHs) are excellent OER electrocatalysts with flexible composition and structure, which have been widely investigated in the past decade. Recent studies have been focusing on the identification of active sites for LDHs during OER process, trying to reveal clear reaction mechanism for designing more efficient LDHs electrocatalysts. Hence, this review tries to discuss the advances in identifying active site of LDHs based OER electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen generation. We first introduce the effect of structure, composition, and defects to the OER performance of LDHs. Furthermore, main attention is paid on the active sites and mechanisms during OER, especially the coordination structures and catalytic mechanisms of active sites. At the end of this review, we put forward the existing problems and shortcomings in this fields, and propose the corresponding solutions, aiming to further promote the development of outstanding OER electrocatalysts towards efficient hydrogen production.

1. Introduction

With the rising demand and consumption of fossil fuels, energy shortage and environmental pollution are becoming severe and unignorable. This makes it necessary to explore sustainable and renewable energy, among which hydrogen is a new energy with splendid application prospects [13]. Up to now, hydrogen is obtained mainly by steam reforming of natural gas or other fossil fuels (e.g., propane, methanol, ethanol, and diesel), which suffers from high cost and low purity of hydrogen [4]. Production of highly pure hydrogen can be achieved by electrochemical water splitting using the electricity transformed from renewable energy such as wind and solar energy [5, 6]. Electrochemical water splitting is carried out in a cell with cathode, anode, and diaphragm. The whole reaction is made up of two half reactions which can be expressed in different ways depending on reaction conditions (Figure 1). The thermodynamic potential of electrochemical water splitting is 1.23 V, corresponding the Gibbs free energy of 237.1 kJ mol-1 [7]. However, no matter for HER (hydrogen evolution reaction) and OER, a high overpotential is always needed to achieve a considerable current density, resulting a huge overall overpotential in practical use. Also, as one of the half reactions, OER is a four-electron process, which causes a low efficiency of energy utilization [810]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop cost-effective and high-performance electrocatalysts for more efficient electrochemical water splitting [11, 12].

In acidic media, noble metal-based catalysts (e.g., RuO2 and IrO2) have been widely applied, while transition metal-based catalysts, especially first-row transition metal-based compounds (e.g., transition metal oxides/hydroxides/oxyhydroxides, nitrides, and phosphides), are always used in alkaline medias [1316]. Although noble metal catalysts are the main commercial electrocatalysts, their scales are restricted due to the high cost and shortage. Owing to the advantages of earth-abundant and excellent activity, these transition metal-based catalysts have attracted great attentions. Among them, layered double hydroxides (LDHs), because of their wide tunability of the types and molar ratios of metal element and the nature of interlayer anions, are outstanding catalysts for OER in alkaline medias [1721]. During the past decade, a great number of works have been focused on the development of LDHs electrocatalysts [2224], aiming at better performance for OER towards hydrogen production.

In addition to the fabrication of advanced LDHs electrocatalysts, the identification and monitoring of real active sites in LDHs under OER conditions are also of great importance, which can further promote the understanding of the catalytic mechanism and the development of optimal electrocatalysts. Recently, advanced characterization methods include ex-situ (e.g., XPS, TEM, and EELS) and in-situ (e.g., Raman electrospectroscopy and EXFAS) characterizations combined with DFT calculation, which are generally used to reveal the change of local coordination environment and electronic states of the electrocatalysts during electrocatalytic process. The research of active sites not only guides researchers to create plentiful sites for OER through controlling synthesis conditions and modified strategies but also helps to optimize the electron structures to improve the electron transfer capability. To date, plenty of reviews have summarized the synthesis strategies, structural characters, and electrochemical performance for the LDHs and their derivatives [2529], but only few reviews mention about the recognition and the assignment of active sites in LDHs during water splitting. Therefore, the latest research progress with respect to the LDHs electrocatalysts for water splitting has been concluded in this review. Moreover, recent exploration in the identification of active sites in LDHs under OER condition has also been summarized. Possible problems and development directions in this domain are also mentioned in this review. We wish this review can give inspiration to the design advanced LDHs electrocatalysts in order to promote the development of OER towards hydrogen production.

2. LDHs Electrocatalysts for OER

LDHs are a large kind of two-dimensional materials that can be represented as [M1-x2+Mx3+(OH)2]x+[Ax/n]n-·mH2O. As shown in Figure 2, divalent (e.g., Ni2+, Co2+, Cu2+, or Zn2+) and trivalent (e.g., Fe3+, Mn3+, or Al3+) metal cations are assembled into electropositive nanoscale laminates through covalent interaction and electronegative anions between two layers, which are connected to the metallic-element-containing layers by weak interaction such as electrostatic interaction and hydrogen-bond interaction [3034]. These two-dimensional laminates and anions are formed longitudinal, orderly, and spatially into three-dimensional crystal structures. The highly dispersed metal cations in the lamella provide abundant active sites for electrochemical reactions with excellent activity and stability in alkaline environment [3538].

2.1. Structural Design of LDHs towards Efficient OER

Although LDHs with various composition have shown great potential for OER towards efficient hydrogen production, the poor electron transport ability and inadequate exposure of active sites are still limiting their activity and stability [3942]. Therefore, compared to low-dimensional materials, hierarchically structural materials with nanoscale are widely reported to apply to highly efficient OER [4346]. Our group successfully designed a one-step method to synthesize NiFe-LDH hollow microsphere (HMS) [47]. Such a structure provides a high surface area, great hydrophilicity, and mesoporous structure (Figure 3(a)). Further electrochemical measurement has shown a low OER onset overpotential with 239 mV at 10 mA cm-2 and a large current density with 71.69 mA cm-2 at of NiFe-LDH-HMS, which was better than commercial Ir/C catalyst. NiFe-LDH HMSs could catalyze OER at in 1 M KOH solution over 40,000 s, which represent splendid long-term stability. This method could also apply to synthesize other LDH-HMSs (e.g., CoFe-LDH, CoNi-LDH, and NiAl-LDH) with a great improvement of OER performance compared to LDHs in nanoparticles (NPs).

Recently, a great innovation of LDHs is the structural transition from powder to integrated nanosheet arrays, which are directly grown on conductive substrates [4850]. Compared to powder samples, nanosheet array has larger specific surface area and more stable electronic transfer as well as the conductive base film, which can provide a channel for transferring electrons and reduce the resistance [5154]. Plenty of efficient synthetic strategies have reported to obtain ultrathin LDHs nanosheets with outstanding morphologies and crystallinity. Among them, template method is a mild and low-cost way to obtain ultrathin LDHs with abundant active sites and defects. Sun et al. developed a topotactic conversion tactic under hydrothermal conditions to transform metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) into LDHs with more edge sites and lattice defects, which led to better OER performance (Figure 3(b)) [55]. Analogously, Tian et al. reported utilizing electric-field assisted hydrolysis to transform MOFs into ultrathin LDHs fleetly (20 s) [56]. Moreover, our group first proposed a fast, precisely controllable, and economic electrochemical synthesis method for the fabrication of NiFe-LDH nanosheet arrays, which possessed effective electrocatalytic performance for OER [18, 57]. As shown in Figure 3(c), ultrathin NiFe-LDH nanosheets with 200-300 nm in lateral length and 8-12 nm in thickness (Figure 3(d)) are synthesized on the substrate surface vertically within only hundreds of seconds (<300 s, while other methods typically needed several hours) under cathodic potential. It was worth noting that NiFe-LDH exhibited outstanding OER activity with lowest Tafel slope of OER (Figure 3(e)) as well as the largest current density under the same potential, much superior than the OER catalysts reported in the same period. Furthermore, the growth scale of NiFe-LDH nanosheet arrays could be expanded from 2 cm2 to 100 cm2 on nickel form substrate with an equally distributed subface appearance (Figure 3(f)). This electrochemical synthesis method also could be applied to grow other LDH nanosheet arrays (e.g., Co-containing LDHs and Mn-containing LDHs) on the surface of several conducting substrates (e.g., conducting cloths and FTO). It was a prominent innovation of synthesis methods of LDHs and made possible to manufacture larger and intricately composed LDHs for future works. With the profounder comprehend of material structures, monolayer LDHs are developed with freer regulation of electronic structures and better OER performance. Monolayer NiCo-LDH was proved to possess a more convenient release of hydrogen and oxygen, leading to more dynamic catalytic sites for OER at a lower potential [58].

2.2. Component Regulation of LDHs towards Efficient OER

It is convenient to regulate the OER performance of LDHs through adjusting the composition of them due to the adjustable metal elements on laminate and anions in the interlayer [5961]. On the one hand, the built-up ways of metal elements on laminate are multitudinous. Researchers have developed a new synthesis method with the regulation of atomic structure to obtain a series of α-MA(II)MB(III) LDH and β-MA(OH)2 (MA = Ni and Co and MB = Co, Fe, and Mn) electrocatalysts and found different groups of metal elements on host layers as dual-metal site feature had disparate synergistic effects. Among them, Fe-containing LDHs revealed highest OER activities, then followed by Co-based Fe-free LDHs, finally by Co-free Fe-free LDHs (Figure 4(a)). Further DFT calculation displayed OH-O content determined by elementary composition could influence OER performance of LDHs [62]. Our group successfully synthesized a series metal-doped NiFeM-LDHs (M = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Mg, and Al), and NiFeV-LDH had the lowest Tafel slope and best OER performance in high potential (Figure 4(b)) [63]. DFT calculation elucidated that NiFeV-LDH (1.491 eV) had a less Gibbs energy change of rate-determining step (the step of M-O + OH- to M-OOH + e-) compared to that of NiFe-LDH (1.517 eV), which meant that NiFeV-LDH has shown a better thermodynamical reaction pathway that caused a low overpotential of OER. Further XPS results have shown the shift of the binding energies of Fe 2p3/2 while that of Ni 2p3/2 remained unchanged, demonstrating that transition metal dopants could capture electrons from Fe atoms in NiFe-LDH which resulted in the impact on O2- bridges between Fe-O-Mdroped and the electron structure of Fe active site (Figures 4(c)–4(e)). Thus, suitable doping metal (e.g., Co2+, V3+, or Cr3+) lead to the effective electron transfer in NiFe-LDH laminate which caused an active nature of OER, and such an effective transfer promoted the electron transfer during OER and provided sites to adsorb oxygen species. Our works show that different OER active metal sites in LDHs cause distinct OER performance, so it comes necessary to identify OER active sites which play a significant role in the design and synthesis of optimal OER catalysts based on LDHs. In addition to inserting another element, we also attempted to use transition elements with a larger atomic mass. NiLa-LDH nanosheet arrays were successfully compounded via electrochemical synthesis with a low onset overpotential of 209 mV at 10 mA cm-2, which transcended most of LDH electrocatalysts reported before [64].

On the other hand, numerous anions are appropriate to insert into the interlayer of LDHs, which can further influence the chemical environment of LDHs. Intermittent anions can not only improve the electrical conductivity, but also promote OH-/O2 transport through increasing the intersheet space. Hunter et al. reported different OER performances of NiFe-LDH caused by diverse interlayer inorganic anions (e.g., NO3-, BF4-, Cl-, CO32-, and PO43-) [65]. The results have shown that the pKa of the conjugate acid of interlayer inorganic anions was closely related to OER catalytic ability of LDHs. Further, DFT calculation found N 1 s species in the precatalyst could combine with edge-site Fe, which led to an excellent OER performance. Our group successfully assembled well-organized LDH nanosheets (NSs)/iron porphyrin (Fe-PP) with ultrathin films through electrochemical layer-by-layer technique, which has shown a distinct enhancement compared to pristine LDH NSs [34].

2.3. Vacancies Construction of LDHs towards Efficient OER

The formation of vacancies is an efficient way to improve local electronic environment and increase active sites. The vacancies construction on LDHs can also enhance the nature activity of LDHs [6668]. Many typical works have been reported to form valid vacancies on the surface of LDHs towards high-efficiency OER. Wang et al. successfully developed plasma-etching methods both in gaseous and liquid conditions to break the interlayer electrostatic interactions of LDHs (water-plasma exfoliation is shown in Figure 5(a)), leading to the exfoliation of ultrathin CoFe-LDH nanosheets as well as the formation of plentiful vacancies [69, 70]. Sun et al. reported a memory effect method which could create multiple vacancies on the surface of NiFe-LDH (Figure 5(b)) [71]. These vacancies increased the number of structural distortion and dangling bonds around the metal sites, resulting in the decrease of surface energy and the enhancement of structural stability. Such unordered conditions around metal sites could observably improve the nature activity of OER.

Further explorations are made based on these advanced achievements. Our group developed an in-situ electrochemical method to synthesize ultrathin CoAl-LDH nanosheet arrays (E-CoAl-LDH-NSA), which were transformed from CoAl-LDH nanosheet arrays via hydrothermal methods (B-CoAl-LDH-NSA), towards high-efficient electrocatalytic performance (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)) [72]. Co 2p XPS (Figure 5(e)) spectra have shown the valence decrease of Co species and the reduction of Al content on the surface. And O 1s XPS spectra (Figure 5(f)) exhibited the disappearance of lattice oxygen (529.7 eV) which meant the introduction of oxygen vacancies. As shown in Figure 5(g), the coordination number of Co-O (1.547 Å) decreases from 4.2 to 3.7 after the exfoliation process, which proved the existence of oxygen vacancies in E-CoAl-LDH-NSA. Multiple atom defects also were observed via HADDF-STEM. The creation of oxygen vacancies changed the electronic structure of LDHs and increase reactive sites on the surface lead to the improvement of OER performance. Besides, long-term test was conducted to appraise the stability of E-CoAl-LDH-NSA, and no decrease in performance was observed during 110 h at 10 mA cm-2 in 1 M KOH solution. Recently, a polyoxometallic acid wet-etching method was reported to rebuild active species on NiFe-LDH. The reconfiguration of active sites could create multiple Ni, Fe, and O vacancies and accelerated the surface dynamic process, giving rise to improvements of OER performance [73].

2.4. Topochemical Conversion of LDHs towards Efficient OER

Moreover, LDHs can transform into other OER electrocatalysts (e.g., metal alloy, oxide, sulfide, nitride, and phosphide) with outstanding OER activity through topological conversion. Our group successfully used LDHs as precursors to obtain FeCoP ultrathin nanosheet arrays (UNSAs) [74]. CoFe-LDH nanosheet arrays were firstly grown on Ni foam via electrosynthesis and then transformed into FeCoP UNSAs through an in-situ phosphatized process (Figure 6(a)). The modified electronic structure of highly exposed active sites on the surface of FeCoP could lead to the improvement of H2O adsorption and convenience of hydrogen dissociation. It exhibited excellent OER electrocatalytic activity with a low Tafel slope of 63 mV dec-1 and long-term cycling stability (Figure 6(b)). Furthermore, FeCoP UNSAs have shown outstanding stability with operating time over 20 h at 10 mA cm-2 in 1 M KOH solution.

OER performance of LDHs can be further enhanced through combining LDHs with highly reactive components (e.g., quantum dots and noble metal single atoms) [7579]. A hydrothermal method was reported to substituting Au atoms for Fe atoms in NiFe-LDH (Figure 6(c)), which caused the improvement of conductivity and optimization of electron transfer. NiFeAu-LDH has shown low overpotential for both OER (181 mV at 10 mA cm-2) and HER (89 mV at 10 mA cm-2). Moreover, the Tafel slope of NiFeAu-LDH was smaller than that of NiFe-LDH and IrO2 (Figure 6(d)) [80]. Our group developed an interface engineering strategy that construct (Ni, Fe)S2@MoS2 heterostructures as a bifunctional electrocatalysts towards efficient water splitting [81]. NiFe-LDH arrays were grown on carbon fiber paper via a hydrothermal way at first, and (Ni, Fe)S2@MoS2 was further obtained by combining sulfuretted NiFe-LDH, thioacetamide, and Mo4+ together in a stainless-steel autoclave (Figure 6(e)). The construction of interfacial active sites could cause outstanding activity to both OER and HER. Also, the Tafel slope of (Ni, Fe)S2@MoS2 for OER was only 43.21 mV dce-1 (Figure 6(f)). In addition, the long-term stability was tested at 10 mA cm-2 in 1 M KOH solution over 40 h, signifying excellent potential for application.

2.5. LDHs Electrocatalysts for OER under Other Conditions

Actually, compared to OER conditions in the laboratory, overall water splitting catalyzed by LDHs is always conducted in more severe environments in practical application with enhanced alkalinity and higher operating potential. A few works have been reported to synthesize stable LDH-based electrocatalysts used in severe conditions. Because of the metal hydroxide on host layers, most LDHs and their deuterogenic catalysts possess strong alkali resistance. In addition, reasonable design of spatial structure can reinforce mass transfer process and keep the LDHs stable under large current densities. 2D LDH-Birnessite hybrid was proved to catalyze water oxidation under industrial hydrogen production conditions (6 M KOH, a current density of 100 mA cm-2) for over 20 hours. And it had a low overpotential (407 mV) at a large current density (400 mA cm-2) and small Tafel slope (43 mV dec-1) of OER [82]. NiFe-LDH/MoSx constructed on iron-nickel foams was also reported to electrocatalyze OER for over 100 hours at large current densities, with overpotentials of 156 and 201 mV at current densities of 100 and 400 mA cm-2, respectively [83]. Also, in the actual application process, the design of LDHs towards efficient hydrogen production is always focused on both HER and OER performances. Therefore, advanced modification strategies aim to synthesize bifunctional LDHs are widely reported. Combining LDHs with components which have highly active HER performance is a universal method. CoFe-LDH@NiFe-LDH nanosheets were reported as outstanding bifunctional electrocatalysts with an overall potential of 1.59 V at 10 mA cm-2 [84]. Besides, PtFeNi alloys/NiFe-LDH heterostructure were successfully constructed, and the optimized electronic transfer led to low overpotentials of 265 and 406 mV at 10 and 300 mA cm-2, respectively [85].

Carrying overall water splitting in neutral/near neutral conditions is another feasible means, while LDHs always have higher overpotentials and slower reaction rates compared to that in alkaline conditions. Due to the lack of OH-, the design of electrocatalysts is mostly focused on the regulation of efficiently catalytic sites and improvement of conductivity. For instance, NiFe-LDH with multivacancies was proved to have low overpotential (270 mV at 10 mA cm-2) for OER in 1 M phosphate buffered saline electrolyte (pH =7) [71], while the reported overpotential of defective NiFe-LDH in 1 M KOH (pH =14) was 195 mV at 10 mA cm-2 [86]. Moreover, Foruzin successfully optimized electron transportation via regulating the amount of Zn2+ in NiZnFe-LDH, which shown onset potential of 0.96 V (vs SCE) and Tafel slope of 16 mV dec-1 [87], while the onset potential of NiZnFe-LDH in 1 M KOH (pH =14) was much higher [63].

3. Identification of Active Site in LDHs for OER

3.1. OER Pathways in Alkaline Solution

Except for developing strategies to exploit highly efficient electrocatalysts, researches on OER pathways and mechanisms are also important, which can give guidance to the recognition of active sites. Because LDHs are composed of metal hydroxide, electrochemical water splitting is always carried out in alkaline solution. The universally accepted pathway of OER in alkaline media (adsorbate evolution mechanism, AEM) is shown in Figure 7(a), in which “M” is on behalf of the active metal site. The whole process includes the following steps. In the first step, the active site adsorbs a hydroxide radical via one-electron oxidation and turns into M-OH. Then, a couple of electron and proton is removed from M-OH and causes the creation of M-O. Next, there are two conversion routes for M-O. On the one hand, two M-O species integrate into M and O2. On the other hand, M-O transforms into M-OOH by coupling with a hydroxide radical through one-electron oxidation, and a proton-coupled electron transfer is further started which leads to the generation of O2 and the renewing of the active site [8890]. Different with AEM, another reaction pathway of OER (lattice oxygen oxidation mechanism, LOM) is shown in Figure 7(b), which only happens under the circumstance of two adjacent oxidized oxygen can substitute a part of sacrificing metal-oxygen and hybridize oxygen holes by themselves. In the process of LOM, O-O bonds can form directly and further separate from metal ions as O2. At present, LOM is only reported to be possible for Co-containing LDHs, while AME is appropriate for most LDHs [61]. Nevertheless, whatever the mechanism is, the comprehension of OER intermediates and their behavior on the surface of electrocatalysts is important to further reveal the truly active sites and improve OER performance. Further efforts need to make to match the OER mechanisms to specific electrocatalysts, which means the recognition of active sites on the surface of LDHs and interaction between the active sites and intermediates.

3.2. Distribution Location of Active Sites for OER in LDHs

The exposed facet of the LDHs, which influences the chemical coordination environment, has an immense impact on their electrocatalytic activity. However, few researches report the theoretical and experimental evidence of the truly active facet of NiFe-LDH for OER. Our group employed finely control of edge facet ratio combined with molecular probe strategy and DFT calculation to reveal the active edge facet of NiFe-LDH. NiFe-LDH with the same crystallinity and different edge area ratio were synthesized by reverse microemulsion strategy [91]. The result of linear sweep voltammetric curves expounded that with the increase of edge area radio, both overpotential and Tafel slope of OER decreased. As shown in Figure 8(a), OER edge active sites could be blocked by cyanate anion, which was the intermediate during synthetic process, and were released after cyclic voltammetry cycling; this results further proved the edge site was the active site. Besides, DFT calculation of Gibbs free energy on different sites and facets has shown that although (001) facet had the lowest surface energy, (001)-O site emerged a high Gibbs free energy change, which caused a high overpotential, while both edge (110)-Ni site and edge (100)-Ni-Fe site have shown a low overpotential (Figure 8(b)). The discovery of active facets can give an important guidance to reveal the active sites of LDHs and design optimal electrocatalysts.

3.3. Single Site as Main Active Site for OER in LDHs

The change of electronic structures and metal valence can make a large influence on the performance of LDHs for OER. Metal elements are always binary transition metal cations in LDH (e.g., Ni2+/Ni3+, Co2+/Co3+, and Fe2+/Fe3+). Also, among transition metal-based catalysts, NiFe-LDH has the almost best catalytic performance in OER with a low Tafel slope and onset potential [92]. Therefore, the identification and calculation of active sites are always based on NiFe-LDH.

There is a view that consider single site (Ni or Fe) as the main OER active site in NiFe-LDH. As early as 1988, Weaver et al. found that Ni(OH)2 deposited on gold electrodes tended to transform into NiOOH during scanning cyclic voltammograms in 1 M KOH by in-situ surface Raman spectroscopy and NiOOH had widely been identified as the main active site for OER in Ni-based LDH [93]. In 2016, Koper et al. used in-situ surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy to prove that NiOOH could deprotonate in highly alkaline pH and produce negatively charged surface species, which are virtual active species for OER [94]. Further researches discovered that the existence of Fe could improve the OER catalytic performance of Ni(OH)2 to a great extent and considered Fe sites were truly active sites for OER [95]. Normally the active species in NiFe-LDH can be transformed from Ni1-xFex(OH)2 to γ-Ni1-xFexOOH during OER, and such a transformation can lead to electron transfer between Ni sites and Fe sites, which may cause the changes of active site. An earlier representative work revealed the role of Fe sites in NiFe-LDH is published in 2015, and Bell et al. resoundingly used HERFD-XAS to reveal the local structure at Fe and Ni sites in (Ni, Fe)OOH [96]. The result of Fe K-edge and Ni K-edge XAS (Figure 9(a)) has shown that the Fe-O and Ni-O bond lengths change from 2.01 Å and 2.06 Å at a potential of 1.12 V to 1.90 Å and 1.89 Å at 1.92 V, respectively, and almost all of Ni2+ sites were oxidized to a higher valence as the potential was increased from 1.12 V to 1.92 V, while Fe3+ sites remained no change (Figures 9(c) and 9(d)). These XAS data are further used to establish the electronic structures of Ni and Fe sites in (Ni, Fe)OOH and calculate Gibbs free energies of reaction intermediates, as Figure 9(e) shown, compared to Ni sites in (Ni, Fe)OOH, and Fe sites could achieve a lower overpotential, which meant Fe sites are truly active sites for OER.

Although the change of energy caused by the import of Fe has been calculated, the oxidation state of Fe species at high OER potentials remains fuzzy. It is worth noting that Fe3+ may have a higher valence during OER which the curves of 1.12 V and 1.92 V are mildly different in Figure 9(d). Therefore, the change of valence state of Fe species on the surface of 3 : 1 Ni:Fe-LDH during OER was successfully observed experimentally through Mössbauer spectroscopy. Fe4+ species were found with an account for 21% of the total Fe at the potential of 1.76 V (vs RHE) during cyclic voltammetric scanning [97]. As shown in Figures 10(d)–10(f), a shoulder appears at , which meant the reflected intensity of Fe4+ species only existed at the potential of significant catalytic OER on the surface of NiFe-LDH, while such a shoulder was not be observed at the OER active potential on the surface of hydrous Fe oxide (Figures 10(h)–10(j)). Combined with the mentioned work of Bell et al., they speculated that Ni3+ irons in the NiFe-LDH and Fe oxyhydroxide lattice had more electrons in π-symmetry (t2g) d-orbitals compared to Fe3+, thus the electron-donating ability of the π-symmetry long pairs of the bridging oxygen atoms would be increased and the existence of high valent such as Fe4+ would be stabilized. Moreover, Fe species located in the edge, corner, or defect sites would have higher catalytic activity, which made it easier to make protonic transfer possible and transform Fe3+-OH into Fe4+ = O. The Fe4+ = O was highly reactive and unstable, and then, OER would occur at these reactive Fe4+ species.

Other methods are also reported to prove Fe site as main catalytically active sites in NiFe-LDH. Combined applications of in-situ Raman spectra and 18O isotope labeling experiment were reported to observe the conditions of lattice oxygen during OER and further provide direct evidence for the different active sites in Fe-free and Fe-containing Ni oxides [98]. In pure Ni-LDH, the δ(Ni3+-O), ν(Ni3+-O) and the ν(O-O) band of NiOO- peaks were shifted to lower frequencies (Figure 11(a)), represented that18O in pure Ni-LDH were substituted by 16O in the electrolyte after subjecting to the OER at 1.65 V for 20 minutes, which meant that Ni sites were active sites and catalyzed OER via a NiOO- precursor, and lattice oxygen atoms constituted NiOO- as redox-active oxygen intermediates during OER. While there seemed no change of δ(Ni3+-O), ν(Ni3+-O), and ν(O-O) peaks (Figure 11(b)) which was the evidence for 18O exchange in NiFe-LDH, it signified that lattice oxygen atoms no longer formed NiOO- and participated in OER and illustrated that Ni sites were no longer the active sites, as a highly reactive surface active site based on Fe was created.

3.4. Synergic Interaction between Different Active Sites for OER in LDHs

Recent researches are more likely to attribute the excellent OER performance of NiFe-LDH to the synergy between Ni sites and Fe sites. The first representative job was reported by Goddard III et al. in 2018 [99], and they successfully predicted the synergy between Fe and Ni which lead to the optimal performance for OER via grand canonical quantum mechanics and DFT calculation, and they predicted the OER mechanisms on NiOOH and (Ni, Fe)OOH as well. Compared with Figures 12(d) and 12(e) and 12(f), it is obvious that the Gibbs free energy needed for O radical formation was reduced from 2.44 eV (pure γ-NiOOH) to 1.99 eV (one-third surface Fe doping γ-(Ni, Fe)OOH) and 1.20 eV (one-third surface Fe doping plus one-third subsurface Fe doping γ-(Ni, Fe)OOH), which caused the OER overpotential reduced from 1.22 V to 0.83 V and 0.42 V. But both in Figures 12(e) and 12(f), catalyzing the O-O coupling on the surface of Fe4+ site needs a lager barrier than that on the surface of Ni4+ sites and made Fe4+-OOH unviable at the 2e step on thermodynamics. In a summary, the high spin d4 Fe4+ utilizes exchange interaction to generate and stabilize the O radical, while the nearby d6 Ni4+ catalyzes the O-O coupling.

The synergy between Ni and Fe is further proved experimentally. Edvinsson et al. reported that NiFe-LDH could dynamically self-optimized active sites during OER and lead to an improved performance of OER [100]. The change of active sites was manifested via XPS and in-situ Raman spectra. Ni 2p spectra have shown that there was an increase in Ni3+ relative to Ni2+ for NiFe-LDH after OER. For the O 1s spectra, the decrease of the peak at lower energy (529.5 eV), which was assigned to lattice oxygen, and the increase of the peak at higher energy (530.6 eV) could be attribute to the bond between lattice oxygen and Ni3+. As Figures 13(d) and 13(e) shown, the frequencies of 477 and 557 cm-1 match well with spectral features of γ-NiOOH which meant the transformation from Ni(OH)2 to NiOOH at high potentials and further oxidized to O2 and H2O. The existence of Fe could inhibit the self-oxidation of Ni and lead to the creation of γ-NiOOH and higher valance Ni, which was the substance of synergistic electronic interplay between Fe and Ni sites in NiFe-LDH.

4. Summary and Prospects

LDHs are considered as outstanding OER catalysts which have widely studied and reported. In this review, we summarized four common strategies applied to improve the OER performance of LDHs. Through these strategies, the overpotential of OER can be decreased obviously, leading to a high efficiency of energy utilization. Furthermore, some works about the identification of active sites for LDHs are introduced. Revelation of reaction mechanism and active sites provide us the theoretical guidance to design efficient electrocatalysts. It is viable to analysis the impact caused by different elements and manufacture exterior active sites via adjusting the types and content of metal elements. Besides, the conclusion of the researches of Ni and Fe sites can be extended to analogous oxides, hydroxides and oxyhydroxides.

Although many works have reported a lot of outstanding catalysts with a low overpotential of OER in alkaline media, several challenges still exist. First of all, the development and exploration of OER catalysts are mostly in the experimental stage at present, which cannot meet up the standards for large-scale practical use. For instance, problems are still remained to enlarge the size of catalysts and maintain the stability during OER with a severe condition (e.g., high alkalinity and high temperature). Besides, most reported preparation methods of LDHs based catalysts are complicated and time-consuming, which brings high cost and restricts their application as well as popularization. Beyond that, more visualized and systematic experimental data is needed to provide to prove whether the highly active OER performance of NiFe-LDH is caused by single active site (Ni or Fe site) or the synergistic interaction between Ni and Fe sites. Moreover, the recognition of reactive oxygen species such as oxygen species adsorbed by active sites on the surface of electrocatalysts and oxygen radical dispersed in the solution during OER still remains ambiguous due to the instable and unapparent existence of reactive oxygen species. After recognizing these reactive oxygen species, how to take advantage of them for more efficient OER is still vital.

Facing these problems and challenges, much effort is still needed to further promote the application of electrochemical water splitting towards efficient hydrogen production. Above all, it is necessary to develop innovative, simple, and low-cost synthetic methods, which can achieve facile and large-scale production of LDHs electrodes satisfying the severe requirements for industrialized OER towards efficient hydrogen production. Besides, more in-situ characterization analyses should be developed and used to identify the concrete form of reactive oxygen species and their effect on facilitating the reaction process. Furthermore, advanced computational chemical technology such as density function theory and molecular dynamics combined with big data should be used to analyze the reaction mechanism and predict electrocatalytic performance of catalysts. In addition, it is a feasible way to use the reactive oxygen species produced during the OER process in organic oxidation reactions for the harvesting of value-added products. Reactive organics are usually difficult to convent by conventional catalysts and always have lower oxidation potential than OER. More importantly, the final products should be obtained readily through physical (e.g., extraction, distill) and chemical (e.g., precipitation) methods. Therefore, many organics are reported (e.g., 5-hydroxymethyfurfural, methanol, and glycerinum) to add in anolyte; thus, the hydrogen production can be conducted at lower overpotential, and value-added products can be obtained simultaneously. Therefore, it is of great importance to not only develop electrocatalysts with excellent performance but also enhance the recognition of OER active sites. We hope this review can offer ideas to further identify the active sites for LDHs with the purpose of providing guidance to design more advanced electrocatalysts towards electrochemical water splitting.

Data Availability

The data and materials used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service, and company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in the manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

M. S. led the project. The manuscript was primarily written by X. W., and further Y. S., M. S., and H. Z. revised. All authors contributed to the manuscript.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22090031, 21922501, and 21871021) and the project funded by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M690319).


  1. Y. P. Zhu, C. Guo, Y. Zheng, and S.-Z. Qiao, “Surface and interface engineering of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient energy conversion processes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 915–923, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. You and Y. Sun, “Chalcogenide and phosphide solid-state electrocatalysts for hydrogen generation,” ChemPlusChem, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 1045–1055, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Yan, Y. Zheng, M. Jaroniec, and S. Qiao, “Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2060–2086, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Ni, D. Leung, and M. Leung, “A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 32, no. 15, pp. 3238–3247, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. Larcher and J. Tarascon, “Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Cheng, J. Shen, B. Peng, Y. Pan, Z. Tao, and J. Chen, “Rapid room-temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline spinels as oxygen reduction and evolution electrocatalysts,” Nature Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. You and Y. Sun, “Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1571–1580, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. McCrory, S. Jung, I. Ferrer, S. Chatman, J. Peters, and T. Jaramillo, “Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 137, no. 13, pp. 4347–4357, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Jiang, A. Zhang, L. Li, and L. Ai, “Nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide nanosheets as high-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 278, pp. 445–451, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Z. Xing, L. Gan, J. Wang, and X. Yang, “Experimental and theoretical insights into sustained water splitting with an electrodeposited nanoporous nickel hydroxide@nickel film as an electrocatalyst,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 7744–7748, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. You, N. Jiang, X. Liu, and Y. Sun, “Simultaneous H2 generation and biomass upgrading in water by an efficient noble-metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 55, no. 34, pp. 9913–9917, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Han, Y. Jin, R. Burgess, N. Dickenson, X. Cao, and Y. Sun, “Visible-light-driven valorization of biomass intermediates integrated with H2 production catalyzed by ultrathin Ni/CdS nanosheets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 139, no. 44, pp. 15584–15587, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Chen, J. Duan, P. Bian, Y. Tang, R. Zheng, and S. Qiao, “Three-dimensional smart catalyst electrode for oxygen evolution reaction,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 5, no. 18, article 1500936, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Tang, H. Wang, H. Wang et al., “Spatially confined hybridization of nanometer-sized NiFe hydroxides into nitrogen-doped graphene frameworks leading to superior oxygen evolution reactivity,” Advanced Materials, vol. 27, no. 30, pp. 4516–4522, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Zhou, D. Zhao, and X. W. Lou, “Double-shelled CoMn2O4 hollow microcubes as high-capacity anodes for lithium-ion batteries,” Advanced Materials, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 745–748, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Teh, Y. Sharma, S. Pramana, and M. Srinivasan, “Nanoweb anodes composed of one-dimensional, high aspect ratio, size tunable electrospun ZnFe2O4 nanofibers for lithium ion batteries,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 38, article 14999, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Dionigi, Z. Zeng, I. Sinev et al., “In-situ structure and catalytic mechanism of NiFe and CoFe layered double hydroxides during oxygen evolution,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Li, M. Shao, H. An et al., “Fast electrosynthesis of Fe-containing layered double hydroxide arrays toward highly efficient electrocatalytic oxidation reactions,” Chemical Science, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 6624–6631, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Zhao, J. Chen, S. Xu et al., “CoMn-layered double hydroxide nanowalls supported on carbon fibers for high-performance flexible energy storage devices,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 1, no. 31, p. 8836, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Shao, F. Ning, Y. Zhao et al., “Core-shell layered double hydroxide microspheres with tunable interior architecture for supercapacitors,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1192–1197, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Z. Li, M. Shao, Q. Yang et al., “Directed synthesis of carbon nanotube arrays based on layered double hydroxides toward highly-efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis,” Nano Energy, vol. 37, pp. 98–107, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. Zhou, M. Shao, M. Wei, and X. Duan, “Advances in efficient electrocatalysts based on layered double hydroxides and their derivatives,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1094–1106, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. Xie, X. Zhang, H. Zhang et al., “Intralayered ostwald ripening to ultrathin nanomesh catalyst with robust oxygen-evolving performance,” Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 10, article 1604765, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Shao, R. Zhang, Z. Li, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Layered double hydroxides toward electrochemical energy storage and conversion: design, synthesis and applications,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 88, pp. 15880–15893, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Song, K. Ji, H. Duan, and M. Shao, “Hydrogen production coupled with water and organic oxidation based on layered double hydroxides,” Exploration, vol. 1, no. 3, article 20210050, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. Xie, Y. Song, S. Li, M. Shao, and M. Wei, “Integrated nanostructural electrodes based on layered double hydroxides,” Energy & Environmental Materials, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 158–171, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Li, S. Jiang, M. Shao, and M. Wei, “Host-guest engineering of layered double hydroxides towards efficient oxygen evolution reaction: recent advances and perspectives,” Catalysts, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 214, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Fan, F. Li, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Catalytic applications of layered double hydroxides: recent advances and perspectives,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 7040–7066, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Wang, D. Yan, S. Hankari, Y. Zou, and S. Wang, “Recent progress on layered double hydroxides and their derivatives for electrocatalytic water splitting,” Advanced Science, vol. 5, no. 8, article 1800064, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Shao, J. Han, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “The synthesis of hierarchical Zn-Ti layered double hydroxide for efficient visible-light photocatalysis,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 519–524, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Han, Y. Dou, J. Zhao, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Flexible CoAl LDH@PEDOT core/shell nanoplatelet array for high-performance energy storage,” Small, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Z. Li, M. Shao, L. Zhou et al., “A flexible all-solid-state micro-supercapacitor based on hierarchical double hydroxide core-shell nanoarrays,” Nano Energy, vol. 20, pp. 294–304, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Shao, F. Ning, J. Zhao, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Hierarchical layered double hydroxide microspheres with largely enhanced performance for ethanol electrooxidation,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 23, no. 28, pp. 3513–3518, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Shao, J. Han, W. Shi, M. Wei, and X. Duan, “Layer-by-layer assembly of porphyrin/layered double hydroxide ultrathin film and its electrocatalytic behavior for H2O2,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1077–1080, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Li, C. Chen, Y. Chen et al., “Polysulfide confinement and highly efficient conversion on hierarchical mesoporous carbon nanosheets for Li–S batteries,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 9, no. 42, article 1901935, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Li, Y. Qu, C. Chen, X. Zhang, and M. Shao, “Theoretical investigation on lithium polysulfide adsorption and conversion for high-performance Li-S batteries,” Nanoscale, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–35, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Cui, Z. Li, A. Xu, J. Li, and M. Shao, “Confinement of zinc salt in ultrathin heterogeneous film to stabilize zinc metal anode,” Small, vol. 17, no. 28, article 2100722, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Miao, J. Liu, L. Chen et al., “Single-atomic-Co cocatalyst on (040) facet of BiVO4 toward efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 427, p. 131011, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. F. Cheng and J. Chen, “Metal–air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2172–2192, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Jiang, Y. Li, J. Liu, and X. Huang, “Building one-dimensional oxide nanostructure arrays on conductive metal substrates for lithium-ion battery anodes,” Nanoscale, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. Ma, S. Dai, and S. Qiao, “Self-supported electrocatalysts for advanced energy conversion processes,” Materials Today, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 265–273, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Wang, H. Zhong, Y. Qin, and X. Zhang, “An efficient three-dimensional oxygen evolution electrode,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 52, no. 20, pp. 5248–5253, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. X. Lai, J. Li, B. A. Korgel et al., “General synthesis and gas-sensing properties of multiple-shell metal oxide hollow microspheres,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2738–2741, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. X. Lai, J. Halpert, and D. Wang, “Recent advances in micro-/nano-structured hollow spheres for energy applications: from simple to complex systems,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 5604–5618, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Ye, D. Zhao, Q. Hao, and C. Xu, “Facile fabrication of hierarchical manganese-cobalt mixed oxide microspheres as high-performance anode material for lithium storage,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 222, pp. 1402–1409, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X. Hu, Y. Zhou, H. Wen, and H. Zhong, “Synthesis of hierarchical hollow tungsten trioxide sphere and its evaluation as an electrocatalyst support for methanol oxidation,” Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 315–320, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Zhang, M. Shao, L. Zhou, Z. Li, K. Xiao, and M. Wei, “Hierarchical NiFe layered double hydroxide hollow microspheres with highly-efficient behavior toward oxygen evolution reaction,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 49, pp. 33697–33703, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Zhao, J. Chen, S. Xu et al., “Hierarchical NiMn layered double hydroxide/carbon nanotubes architecture with superb energy density for flexible supercapacitors,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 2938–2946, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Y. Liu, N. Fu, G. Zhang et al., “Design of hierarchical Ni-Co@Ni-Co layered double hydroxide core-shell structured nanotube array for high-performance flexible all-solid-state battery-type supercapacitors,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 27, no. 8, article 1605307, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Guan, X. Liu, W. Ren, X. Li, C. Cheng, and J. Wang, “Rational design of metal-organic framework derived hollow NiCo2O4Arrays for flexible supercapacitor and electrocatalysis,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 7, no. 12, article 1602391, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Yuan, M. Zhao, J. Yuan, and C. Li, “Ni foam supported three-dimensional vertically aligned and networked layered CoO nanosheet/graphene hybrid array as a high-performance oxygen evolution electrode,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 319, pp. 159–167, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Mamun, X. Su, H. Zhang et al., “Strongly coupled CoCr2O4/carbon nanosheets as high performance electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction,” Small, vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 2866–2871, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Ouyang, X. Wang, and S. Wang, “Phosphorus-doped CoS2 nanosheet arrays as ultra-efficient electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 75, pp. 14160–14163, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. X. Li, Y. Fang, S. Zhao et al., “Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon nanosheet/carbon nanotube hybrids as metal-free bi-functional electrocatalysts for water oxidation and oxygen reduction,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 4, no. 34, pp. 13133–13141, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. H. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Lian et al., “Topotactically transformed polygonal mesopores on ternary layered double hydroxides exposing under-coordinated metal centers for accelerated water dissociation,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 52, article 2006784, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Tian, F. Jiang, D. Yuan, L. Zhang, Q. Chen, and M. Hong, “Electric-field assisted in situ hydrolysis of bulk metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) into ultrathin metal oxyhydroxide nanosheets for efficient oxygen evolution,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 132, no. 31, pp. 13201–13208, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Shao, F. Ning, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Hierarchical nanowire arrays based on ZnO core-layered double hydroxide shell for largely enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 580–586, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. Kang, X. Qiu, Q. Hu et al., “Valence oscillation and dynamic active sites in monolayer NiCo hydroxides for water oxidation,” Nature Catalysis, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1050–1058, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. Chen, L. Tao, S. Du et al., “Advanced exfoliation strategies for layered double hydroxides and applications in energy conversion and storage,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 14, article 1909832, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Chung, P. Lopes, P. Martins et al., “Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction,” Nature Energy, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 222–230, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Z. Huang, J. Song, Y. Du et al., “Chemical and structural origin of lattice oxygen oxidation in Co-Zn oxyhydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts,” Nature Energy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 329–338, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. Dionigi, J. Zhu, Z. Zeng et al., “Intrinsic Electrocatalytic activity for oxygen evolution of crystalline 3d-transition metal layered double hydroxides,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 133, no. 26, pp. 14567–14578, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. L. Zhou, C. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, and M. Shao, “Host modification of layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst to boost the thermodynamic and kinetic activity of oxygen evolution reaction,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 15, article 2009743, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Jiang, Y. Liu, W. Xie, and M. Shao, “Electrosynthesis of hierarchical NiLa-layered double hydroxide electrode for efficient oxygen evolution reaction,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 33, pp. 125–129, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Hunter, W. Hieringer, J. Winkler, H. Gray, and A. Müller, “Effect of interlayer anions on [NiFe]-LDH nanosheet water oxidation activity,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1734–1743, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. V. Nicolosi, M. Chhowalla, M. Kanatzidis, M. Strano, and J. Coleman, “Liquid exfoliation of layered materials,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6139, article 1226419, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. F. Song and X. Hu, “Exfoliation of layered double hydroxides for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 4477, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. W. Han, J. Wei, K. Xiao et al., “Activating lattice oxygen in layered lithium oxides through cation vacancies for enhanced urea electrolysis,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 61, no. 31, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu et al., “Layered double hydroxide nanosheets with multiple vacancies obtained by dry exfoliation as highly efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysts,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 5867–5871, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Liu, Y. Wang, D. Liu, Y. Zou, and S. Wang, “Water-plasma-enabled exfoliation of ultrathin layered double hydroxide nanosheets with multivacancies for water oxidation,” Advanced Materials, vol. 29, no. 30, article 1701546, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. Z. Yuan, S. M. Bak, P. Li et al., “Activating layered double hydroxide with multivacancies by memory effect for energy-efficient hydrogen production at neutral pH,” ACS Energy Letters, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1412–1418, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. Y. Song, Z. Li, K. Fan et al., “Ultrathin layered double hydroxides nanosheets array towards efficient electrooxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural coupled with hydrogen generation,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 299, p. 120669, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Z. Cai, P. Wang, J. Zhang et al., “Reinforced layered double hydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: a polyoxometallic acid wet-etching approach and synergistic mechanism,” Advanced Materials, vol. 34, no. 26, article 2110696, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. L. Zhou, M. Shao, J. Li, S. Jiang, M. Wei, and X. Duan, “Two-dimensional ultrathin arrays of CoP: electronic modulation toward high performance overall water splitting,” Nano Energy, vol. 41, pp. 583–590, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. F. Ning, M. Shao, C. Zhang, S. Xu, M. Wei, and X. Duan, “Co3O4@layered double hydroxide core/shell hierarchical nanowire arrays for enhanced supercapacitance performance,” Nano Energy, vol. 7, pp. 134–142, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. M. Shao, F. Ning, J. Zhao, M. Wei, D. Evans, and X. Duan, “Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2@layered double hydroxide core-shell microspheres for magnetic separation of proteins,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 1071–1077, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Xi et al., “Single-atom Au/NiFe layered double hydroxide electrocatalyst: probing the origin of activity for oxygen evolution reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 140, no. 11, pp. 3876–3879, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. L. Zhou, S. Jiang, Y. Liu, M. Shao, M. Wei, and X. Duan, “Ultrathin CoNiP@layered double hydroxides core-shell nanosheets arrays for largely enhanced overall water splitting,” ACS Applied Energy Materials, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 623–631, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. X. Li, L. Zheng, S. Liu, T. Ouyang, S. Ye, and Z. Liu, “Heterostructures of NiFe LDH hierarchically assembled on MoS2 nanosheets as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for overall water splitting,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 4761–4765, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. X. Li, W. Han, K. Xiao et al., “Enhancing hydrogen evolution reaction through modulating electronic structure of self-supported NiFe LDH,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 4184–4190, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Y. Liu, S. Jiang, S. Li et al., “Interface engineering of (Ni, Fe)S2@MoS2 heterostructures for synergetic electrochemical water splitting,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 247, pp. 107–114, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Z. Chen, M. Ju, M. Sun et al., “TM LDH meets birnessite: a 2d-2d hybrid catalyst with long-term stability for water oxidation at industrial operating conditions,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 60, no. 17, pp. 9699–9705, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. H. Zhang, G. Shen, X. Liu et al., “Self-supporting NiFe LDH-MoSx integrated electrode for highly efficient water splitting at the industrial electrolysis conditions,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1732–1741, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. R. Yang, Y. Zhou, Y. Xing et al., “Synergistic coupling of CoFe-LDH arrays with NiFe-LDH nanosheet for highly efficient overall water splitting in alkaline media,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 253, pp. 131–139, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. G. Huang, Y. Li, R. Chen et al., “Electrochemically formed PtFeNi alloy nanoparticles on defective NiFe LDHs with charge transfer for efficient water splitting,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1101–1110, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Liu, H. Zhang, E. Hu et al., “Boosting oxygen evolution activity of NiFe-LDH using oxygen vacancies and morphological engineering,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 9, no. 41, pp. 23697–23702, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. L. Foruzin, Z. Rezvani, Y. Shishavan, and B. Habibi, “Ni2Zn0.5Fe-LDH modified carbon paste electrode as an efficient electrocatalyst for water oxidation in neutral media,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 150–160, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. N. Suen, S. Hung, Q. Quan, N. Zhang, Y. Xu, and H. Chen, “Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 337–365, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. F. Song, L. Bai, A. Moysiadou et al., “Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: an application-inspired renaissance,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 140, no. 25, pp. 7748–7759, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. C. Hu, L. Zhang, and J. Gong, “Recent progress made in the mechanism comprehension and design of electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2620–2645, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. Y. Zhang, W. Xie, J. Ma et al., “Active facet determination of layered double hydroxide for oxygen evolution reaction,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 60, pp. 127–134, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. D. Zhao, K. Jiang, Y. Pi, and X. Huang, “Superior electrochemical oxygen evolution enabled by three-dimensional layered double hydroxide nanosheet superstructures,” ChemCatChem, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 84–88, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. J. Desilvestro, D. Corrigan, and M. Weaver, “Characterization of redox states of nickel hydroxide film electrodes by in situ surface Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 885–892, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. O. Morales, D. Suspedra, and M. Koper, “The importance of nickel oxyhydroxide deprotonation on its activity towards electrochemical water oxidation,” Chemical Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2639–2645, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. L. Trotochaud, S. Young, J. Ranney, and S. Boettcher, “Nickel-iron oxyhydroxide oxygen-evolution electrocatalysts: the role of intentional and incidental iron incorporation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 136, no. 18, pp. 6744–6753, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. D. Friebel, M. Louie, M. Bajdich et al., “Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni, Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 1305–1313, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. J. Chen, L. Dang, H. Liang et al., “Operando analysis of NiFe and Fe oxyhydroxide electrocatalysts for water oxidation: detection of Fe4+ by Mössbauer spectroscopy,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 137, no. 48, pp. 15090–15093, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. S. Lee, K. Banjac, M. Lingenfelder, and X. Hu, “Oxygen isotope labeling experiments reveal different reaction sites for the oxygen evolution reaction on nickel and nickel iron oxides,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 131, no. 30, pp. 10401–10405, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. H. Xiao, H. Shin, and W. Goddard, “Synergy between Fe and Ni in the optimal performance of (Ni, Fe)OOH catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 23, pp. 5872–5877, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. Z. Qiu, C. Tai, G. A. Niklasson, and T. Edvinsson, “Direct observation of active catalyst surface phases and the effect of dynamic self-optimization in NiFe-layered double hydroxides for alkaline water splitting,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 572–581, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2022 Xin Wan et al. Exclusive Licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

 PDF Download Citation Citation
Altmetric Score