Research / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6727524 |

Jia Liu, Ji-Chang Ren, Tao Shen, Xinyi Liu, Christopher J. Butch, Shuang Li, Wei Liu, "Asymmetric Schottky Contacts in van der Waals Metal-Semiconductor-Metal Structures Based on Two-Dimensional Janus Materials", Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 6727524, 8 pages, 2020.

Asymmetric Schottky Contacts in van der Waals Metal-Semiconductor-Metal Structures Based on Two-Dimensional Janus Materials

Received26 Jul 2020
Accepted24 Sep 2020
Published15 Nov 2020


Physical and electronic asymmetry plays a crucial role in rectifiers and other devices with a directionally variant current-voltage (-) ratio. Several strategies for practically creating asymmetry in nanoscale components have been demonstrated, but complex fabrication procedures, high cost, and incomplete mechanistic understanding have significantly limited large-scale applications of these components. In this work, we present density functional theory calculations which demonstrate asymmetric electronic properties in a metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) interface composed of stacked van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures. Janus MoSSe has an intrinsic dipole due to its asymmetric structure and, consequently, can act as either an n-type or p-type diode depending on the face at the interior of the stacked structure (SeMoS-SMoS vs. SMoSe-SMoS). In each configuration, vdW forces dominate the interfacial interactions, and thus, Fermi level pinning is largely suppressed. Our transport calculations show that not only does the intrinsic dipole cause asymmetric - characteristics in the MSM structure but also that different transmission mechanisms are involved across the S-S (direct tunneling) and S-Se interface (thermionic excitation). This work illustrates a simple and practical method to introduce asymmetric Schottky barriers into an MSM structure and provides a conceptual framework which can be extended to other 2D Janus semiconductors.

1. Introduction

Physical and electronic asymmetry plays a crucial role in devices like rectifiers [14], which produce current-voltage (-) outputs and vary directionally depending on the applied bias. At the nanoscale, one strategy to produce current asymmetry is through metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) structures composed of two metal-semiconductor (MS) junctions with distinct Schottky barriers connected back to back [5, 6]. In such an MSM, when a nonzero bias voltage is applied, one Schottky barrier is forward biased and the other one is reversed biased [6]. Compared to a single Schottky barrier MS diode, the second MS interface of the MSM diode further modulates current allowing backward current to also vary with voltage. An asymmetric MSM structure can be created by several strategies including using two electrodes with different work functions [7], asymmetric contact geometries [8], externally applied mechanical forces (e.g., piezoelectric-potential-controlled Schottky diodes) [5], and enhanced metal oxidation or defect density differences [9]. However, large-scale application of these techniques is limited by high cost and difficulties in fabrication which include force-induced instability, shape selection, and Fermi level pinning (FLP) [8, 10]. Among these, FLP caused by defects is the most universal [7], can significantly hinder effective control of Schottky barriers at the contact, and requires complicated treatment of the bulk metal to avoid [11]. To overcome these obstacles, herein, we propose a new class of MSM structure fabricated by stacking two-dimensional (2D) Janus materials and 2D metals. Compared to other approaches, fabrication of these MSMs is straightforward and effective since (1) the surface of these 2D materials is well controlled; (2) the dipole which generates the surface asymmetry is inherent to the Janus material (e.g., MoSSe [12] and GeSe [13]); (3) the interface of the layered 2D materials is dominated by van der Waals (vdW) forces rather than chemical bonds, significantly suppressing the effect of FLP; and (4) asymmetric Schottky contacts can be created without requiring external forces, shape selection, doping, or precise control of contact geometries.

The term “Janus” is derived from the two-faced Roman god of transitions, and in nanotechnology, it refers to structures with two distinct faces, usually due to different terminating atoms on opposite surfaces [14, 15]. A large variety of 2D Janus materials have been predicted theoretically and/or fabricated experimentally [1620]. Examples include Janus transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs, such as MoSSe, WSSe, MoSTe, and WSTe) [16, 19, 2129], Janus metal-nitrides and metal-carbides (MXenes, such as Cr2COF and V2COF) [14], Janus graphene [15, 18, 30], Janus black arsenic-phosphorus [31], Janus group-III chalcogenides (such as Ga2SSe, In2SSe, Ga2STe, and In2STe) [19, 32], and Janus group IV monochalcogenides (such as GeSe and SnS) [13, 33]. These asymmetric structures generate intrinsic electric fields () associated with the interior dipole across the plane, causing the two surfaces to have different work functions, and consequently, different Schottky barriers are generated dependent on the interfacial surface. On the basis of these observations, we hypothesized that when a Janus monolayer, such as MoSSe, is used as the semiconductor in MSM structures, the intrinsic dipole may introduce electronic asymmetry in a simple and practical manner.

In this contribution, we propose an asymmetric MSM design composed of layered Janus MoSSe and 1T-phase MoS2. MoSSe has been fabricated experimentally, by substituting S (Se) atoms with Se (S) in the exposed surface of a MoS2 (MoSe2) monolayer [16, 22]. The metallic 1T-phase MoS2 [34] was selected to avoid FLP problems associated with the use of bulk metals as contacts [7, 35, 36]. While metallic 1T MoS2 [34] is dynamically instable, it has been demonstrated experimentally [37] and was selected, largely, as a prototype to demonstrate that FLP problems associated with the use of bulk metals as contacts can be avoided through employing 2D materials [7, 35, 36]. Our calculations predict different types of Schottky contacts at the interface of MoSSe/MoS2 heterostructures: the n-type S-S interface and p-type S-Se interface. In both cases, the intrinsic dipole of MoSSe is preserved, while the FLP effects are significantly suppressed as the 2D materials are fully bonded and interact through van der Waals (vdW) forces [38, 39]. In this MSM structure, the asymmetric Schottky barriers originate from the reversal of the inherent electric field in Janus MoSSe, which always points from Se to S atoms. The carrier transports under positive and negative bias voltages are found to be dominated by thermionic excitation and tunneling, respectively, further underscoring the asymmetry of the structure. Although discussions of our findings are mainly based on MoSSe, the concepts that we outline here can be extended to other 2D Janus semiconductors.

2. Computational Methods

Geometry optimizations and electronic property calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) [40, 41]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) algorithm [42] was selected as the exchange-correlation functional. The interaction between ionic core and valance electrons was described using the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method [43, 44]. The DFT+vdW method of Tkatchenko and Scheffler [45] was employed to account for long-range vdW interactions. The DFT+vdW method was constructed from mean-field electronic structure calculations and has been shown to perform well in describing vdW forces between 2D materials [46, 47]. An energy cutoff of 400 eV and a Monkhorst-Pack scheme with a -point mesh of were employed to ensure accuracy. Structures were relaxed with energy change converged to  eV/cell in electronic self-consistency cycles and all forces smaller than 0.01 eV/Å in ionic relation loops. The vacuum width is larger than 15 Å in the direction to avoid interaction between periodic slabs. When calculating the Schottky barriers and , the axis is set to 150 Å. The - characteristics and other transport properties of the contacts were calculated using the nonequilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) method within the frame of DFT, as implemented in the Atomistix ToolKit (ATK) package [48]. We used numerical linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) basis sets in device calculations.

The optimized lattice constants for Janus MoSSe and 1T MoS2 are 3.23 and 3.13 Å, respectively, consistent with previous studies [16, 49, 50]. The Mo-S bond distance in 1T MoS2 is 2.43 Å. In MoSSe, the bond distance of Mo-S slightly decreases to 2.41 Å while Mo-Se is 2.53 Å due to the larger radius of the Se atom. After stacking, the relaxed lattice constants, and , of contacts with the interfaces are 3.21 and 3.20 Å, respectively, with a lattice mismatch .

3. Results and Discussion

Our calculations show that MoSSe is a semiconductor with a direct band gap of 1.63 eV, consistent with the experimental optical gap (1.68 eV) [22], while 1T MoS2 is a 2D metal (see Figure S1). As shown in Figure 1(a), the asymmetric MSM structure has two contacts, where both contacts (right side) and (left side) are vdW heterojunctions. Since and exhibit different Schottky barrier heights (SBHs), this sandwich structure yields an asymmetric - characteristic. Figure 1(b) shows that the forward current from drain to source is one order of magnitude larger than the backward . Under positive , the electrons drift from source to drain through the n-type barrier of , while the holes drift in the opposite direction and across the p-type barrier of . Under negative , barriers for both electrons and holes increase relative to under positive , as shown in the schematic band diagrams in Figure 1(b).

Figure 1(c) shows that under negative , the varies slightly with increasing temperature (). Under positive bias, has a much greater sensitivity to temperature. These results suggest different transport mechanisms between the two directions. To discern the transport mechanisms contributing to the current under each condition, we plotted the spatially resolved local density of states (LDOS) along the transport direction under (Figure 1(d)1(f)). The flat conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) at the metal-semiconductor interface (right illustration in Figures 1(b) and 1(e)), along with the exponential - curve (Figure 1(b)), indicate that carrier transport under positive bias voltages is mainly through thermionic excitation [51, 52]. In contrast, the CB and VB near the interface bend downward with the barrier becoming sharp under negative (Figure 1(b) left, and Figure 1(f)) leading to which appears to increase quadratically relative to (Figure 1(b)). These results illustrate that carrier transport in this case is consistent with the Fowler-Nordheim (F-N) model [53], implying it occurs mainly through a tunneling mechanism. In the F-N model, [53, 54], where is the reduced Planck constant, is the effective mass of carrier in system, and is the barrier width. These trends show that forward conduction in the MSM occurs through thermionic excitation while back-current occurs through F-N tunneling. Due to these different mechanisms, the scaling of these effects with temperature varies, yielding a temperature critical point () around 250 K where the preferred direction of conduction inverts at (when , while it reversed when ). Consequently, the temperature dependence of thermionic transport has a key influence on the rectification properties of the MSM.

Given that each MS junction contributes to the overall device performance, we constructed two conventional symmetric MSM structures composed of two of each interface (S-S in Figure 2(a) and S-Se in Figure 2(b)) for comparison to the asymmetric device discussed above. Like the asymmetric MSM structure, the electrode and central region lengths for these devices were set to 5.55 and 66.64 Å, respectively, for (i.e., symmetric device made from two ) and 5.55 and 66.57 Å, respectively, for (device with two ). As expected, the computed - curves exhibit a diode-like feature for both and under positive from 0.00 to 0.40 V. In contrast to the asymmetric counterparts, and display identical - curves under positive and negative voltage due to the symmetric band diagrams and identical transport mechanisms at the two interfaces. Because the current in has only a weak dependence on (Figure 2(c)), we speculated that the transmission in is dominated by direct quantum tunneling. Unlike F-N tunneling, the direct tunneling model predicts to vary linearly with [53, 54]. Above 0.30 V, however, F-N tunneling does occur, as shown in Figure 2(c) and Figure S2. In contrast, in (Figure 2(d)) has exponential temperature dependence, increasing by a factor of 10 between 50 and 300 K, suggesting thermionic excitation to be the main transport mechanism. Under the same conditions, the current in is , which is about two orders of magnitude lower than .

The differences in the current and temperature dependence above show that and have markedly different transmission mechanisms and magnitudes and the order of their assembly controls the properties of the resultant device. To understand the physical origins of these differences between the two junctions, we plotted the band structures of and (Figures 2(e) and 2(f)). These band structures show that the metallic properties of 1T MoS2 are well preserved in and . Further, the band structure of MoSSe is almost unchanged relative to the isolated monolayer band structure (Figure S1). These largely retained band configurations, interlayer distances typical of vdW interactions, and weak adsorption energies clearly suggest that the interactions between the two layers are dominated by the vdW forces. This vdW interface effectively suppresses the FLP effect, due to the reduction of localized densities of states at the interface, metal-induced gap states, and defect/disorder-induced gap states [38, 55, 56].

Schottky barrier heights and can be calculated from band structures of the metal-semiconductor junction using the following equations [13, 57]: where is the Fermi level of the junction, while and are the CBM and VBM energies of the 2D semiconductor in contact. According to Eqs. (1) and (2), is an n-type Schottky contact ( and are 0.76 and 0.98 eV, respectively) with bands bending downward slightly, while is a p-type Schottky contact ( and are 1.26 and 0.45 eV, respectively) with significant upward bending at the metal-semiconductor interface. Notably, although vdW forces dominate the metal-semiconductor interaction, and still deviate from the Schottky-Mott rule [58]: where and are the work function and electron affinity of 1T MoS2 and Janus MoSSe. From equation (3), the idealized Schottky barrier () would be expected to be 0.84 eV.

The deviation from the ideal Schottky barrier is likely due to the contribution of the inherent field of Janus MoSSe () along with the two interfacial dipoles (, ). To determine the degree to which each of these elements affects the deviation, we separated the two layers of and and measured the variation of and (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). These calculations show the interface dipole decreases rapidly and that the effect can be ignored at distances larger than 5 Å based on the near-total reversion of the material bands back to their isolated states. To ensure no interaction between systems, the period was set to 150 Å (sensitivity analysis in Figure S3). Interestingly, both and become p-type when  Å and converge to 0.77 and 0.39 eV, respectively (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)), with the two interfaces being equivalent at 3.28 Å where transforms from p-type to an n-type structure.

Both and can contribute to the changes in the Schottky barrier with distance. The magnitude of these effects can be spatially resolved using the Hartree difference potential () calculated as follows: where and represent the Hartree potentials of system and each atom. Figures 3(e) and 3(f) show the averaged in the plane along the -axis according to Eq. (4) clearly indicating directs from Se to S atoms (orange arrows in Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) in agreement with previous studies [17]. This results in lower electrostatic potential at the MoSSe side of and higher potential for the MoSSe side of , an effect which will naturally perturb the Schottky barrier height. In contrast, Figures 3(g) and 3(h) show the sum of the plane averaged of the isolated systems (orange lines) as compared to the assembled contacts. In each case, the difference between the isolated and assembled systems corresponds to the effect of . Figure 3(g) shows to be oriented with , pointing from MoSSe to 1T MoS2, and increasing the electrostatic potential from metal to semiconductor (). Inversely, and have opposite direction, reducing the apparent magnitude of and decreasing (Figure 3(h)). These calculations are consistent with the deviations from the ideal Schottky barrier and demonstrate how the synergistic effect of and govern the electronic properties of and . The large on the sulfur side of MoSSe will cause a greater barrier difference in while the smaller on the Se side leads to less deviation in This also rationalizes the transition of from p-type to n-type at  Å as the synergistic effect abates.

Finally, to generalize our proposed approach to other 2D Janus materials, we calculated the Schottky barriers in the two sides of Janus MoSTe and MoSeTe contacted with 1T MoS2 (Figure S4). Both their projected band structures (Figure 4(a)) and barriers and (Figure 4(b)) indicate these Janus MSMs to also exhibit asymmetric SBHs. Notably, while Janus MoSSe would generate the largest () among these three structures, the relationship is not linear with the vacuum level shifts of the free-standing Janus layers [21]. This initial result shows how the dipole of a Janus structure, the initial work function, and charge transfer also have a great influence on the asymmetry of barriers.

4. Conclusions

We demonstrate that 1T MoS2 and Janus MoSSe can form an asymmetric van der Waals MSM device with two different barriers contacted back to back through reversing the intrinsic dipole of Janus MoSSe. The transmissions in this MSM device under positive and negative are dominated by thermionic excitation and tunneling, respectively, and the rectifying directions and ratios could be effectively controlled by temperature. Furthermore, through the calculations of the differences of electrostatic potentials, we found that the rectifying behaviors hugely associate with the interaction between the intrinsic electric field of the Janus layer and the field induced at the interface. The asymmetric Schottky barrier heights inherent to this design are caused by the intrinsic field of the Janus semiconductor, meaning there is ample room to explore other 2D metals in the search for new MSM devices and the design of “all-2D” flexible high-performance rectifiers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.


We acknowledge supports from the NSF of China (51722102, 21773120, 51602155), the NSF of Jiangsu Province (BK20180448), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30920041116, 30920021159, 30919011405), and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro&Nano Materials and Technology.

Supplementary Materials

The atomic structures and band structures of Janus MoSSe and 1T MoS2, respectively; the plotted ln () vs. ln () and 1/V for ; the and movements at point of and ; the vdW contact structures of Janus MoSTe (or MoSeTe) and 1T MoS2. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. A. Di Bartolomeo, “Graphene Schottky diodes: an experimental review of the rectifying graphene/semiconductor heterojunction,” Physics Reports, vol. 606, no. 1, pp. 1–58, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J.-Y. Wu, Y. T. Chun, S. Li, T. Zhang, and D. Chu, “Electrical rectifying and photosensing property of Schottky diode based on MoS2,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 29, pp. 24613–24619, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. X. Li, Z. Q. Fan, P. Z. Liu et al., “Gate-controlled reversible rectifying behaviour in tunnel contacted atomically-thin MoS2 transistor,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 970, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Murali, M. Dandu, S. Das, and K. Majumdar, “Gate-tunable WSe2/SnSe2Backward diode with ultrahigh-reverse rectification ratio,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5657–5664, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Zhou, P. Fei, Y. Gu et al., “Piezoelectric-potential-controlled polarity-reversible Schottky diodes and switches of ZnO wires,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3973–3977, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. M. Sze, D. J. Coleman Jr., and A. Loya, “Current transport in metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) structures,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1209–1218, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Kang, W. Liu, D. Sarkar, D. Jena, and K. Banerjee, “Computational study of metal contacts to monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors,” Physical Review X, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 14, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Zhou, S. Raju, B. Li, M. Chan, Y. Chai, and C. Y. Yang, “Self-driven metal–semiconductor–metal WSe2Photodetector with asymmetric contact geometries,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 28, no. 45, article 1802954, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. di Bartolomeo, A. Grillo, F. Urban et al., “Asymmetric schottky contacts in bilayer MoS2 Field effect transistors,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 28, no. 28, article 1800657, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Fontana, T. Deppe, A. K. Boyd et al., “Electron-hole transport and photovoltaic effect in gated MoS2 Schottky junctions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, article 1634, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Liu, J. Guo, E. Zhu et al., “Approaching the Schottky–Mott limit in van der Waals metal–semiconductor junctions,” Nature, vol. 557, no. 7707, pp. 696–700, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Li, J. Wang, B. Zhou et al., “Tunable interlayer coupling and Schottky barrier in graphene and Janus MoSSe heterostructures by applying an external field,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 20, no. 37, pp. 24109–24116, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Peng, Y. Cui, L. Sun et al., “Dipole controlled Schottky barrier in the blue-phosphorene-phase of GeSe based van der Waals heterostructures,” Nanoscale Horiz, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 480–489, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. C. Frey, A. Bandyopadhyay, H. Kumar, B. Anasori, Y. Gogotsi, and V. B. Shenoy, “Surface-engineered MXenes: electric field control of magnetism and enhanced magnetic anisotropy,” ACS Nano, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2831–2839, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Yang, Q. Xie, H. Peng, and Z. Liu, “Janus graphene from asymmetric two-dimensional chemistry,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, article 1443, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Zhang, S. Jia, I. Kholmanov et al., “Janus monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 8192–8198, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Li, W. Wei, H. Wang, B. Huang, Y. Dai, and T. Jacob, “Intrinsic electric field-induced properties in Janus MoSSe van der Waals structures,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 559–565, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. I. Jeon, M. D. Peeks, S. Savagatrup et al., “Janus graphene: scalable self-assembly and solution-phase orthogonal functionalization,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, no. 21, article 1900438, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. Li, Y. Cheng, and W. Huang, “Recent progress of Janus 2D transition metal chalcogenides: from theory to experiments,” Small, vol. 14, no. 45, article 1802091, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Yagmurcukardes, Y. Qin, S. Ozen et al., “Quantum properties and applications of 2D Janus crystals and their superlattices,” Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 7, no. 1, article 011311, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. C. Riis-Jensen, T. Deilmann, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, “Classifying the electronic and optical properties of Janus monolayers,” ACS Nano, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 13354–13364, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A.-Y. Lu, H. Zhu, J. Xiao et al., “Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 744–749, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. Chen, X. Hou, X. Shi, and H. Pan, “Two-dimensional Janus transition metal oxides and chalcogenides: multifunctional properties for photocatalysts, electronics, and energy conversion,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 41, pp. 35289–35295, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Jin, T. Wang, Z.-R. Gong, C. Long, and Y. Dai, “Prediction of an extremely long exciton lifetime in a Janus-MoSTe monolayer,” Nanoscale, vol. 10, no. 41, pp. 19310–19315, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Kandemir and H. Sahin, “Bilayers of Janus WSSe: monitoring the stacking type via the vibrational spectrum,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 20, no. 25, pp. 17380–17386, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. Wang, “2H →1T phase transformation in Janus monolayer MoSSe and MoSTe: an efficient hole injection contact for 2H-MoS2,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 6, no. 47, pp. 13000–13005, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Jin, X. Tang, X. Tan, S. C. Smith, Y. Dai, and L. Kou, “A Janus MoSSe monolayer: a superior and strain-sensitive gas sensing material,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1099–1106, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Bafekry, M. Yagmurcukardes, B. Akgenc, M. Ghergherehchi, and C. V. Nguyen, “Van der Waals heterostructures of MoS2 and Janus MoSSe monolayers on graphitic boron-carbon-nitride (BC3, C3N, C3N4 and C4N3) nanosheets: a first-principles study,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 53, no. 35, article 355106, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Yagmurcukardes and F. M. Peeters, “Stable single layer of Janus MoSO: strong out-of-plane piezoelectricity,” Physical Review B, vol. 101, no. 15, article 155205, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. F. Chen, Y. F. Zhu, and Q. Jiang, “Utilisation of Janus material for controllable formation of graphene p–n junctions and superlattices,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 4146–4154, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. L. Li, C. Bacaksiz, M. Nakhaee, R. Pentcheva, F. M. Peeters, and M. Yagmurcukardes, “Single-layer Janus black arsenic-phosphorus (b-AsP): optical dichroism, anisotropic vibrational, thermal, and elastic properties,” Physical Review B, vol. 101, no. 13, article 134102, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. Kandemir and H. Sahin, “Janus single layers of In2SSe: a first-principles study,” Physical Review B, vol. 97, no. 15, p. 7, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Yang, Y. Ma, S. Zhang, H. Jin, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, “GeSe@SnS: stacked Janus structures for overall water splitting,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 19, pp. 12060–12067, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Eda, H. Yamaguchi, D. Voiry, T. Fujita, M. Chen, and M. Chhowalla, “Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 5111–5116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Bardeen, “Surface states and rectification at a metal semi-conductor contact,” Physics Review, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 717–727, 1947. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. V. Heine, “Theory of surface states,” Physics Review, vol. 138, no. 6A, pp. A1689–A1696, 1965. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Shi, Z. Sun, and Y. H. Hu, “Synthesis, stabilization and applications of 2-dimensional 1T metallic MoS2,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 6, no. 47, pp. 23932–23977, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Liu, P. Stradins, and S. H. Wei, “Van der Waals metal-semiconductor junction: weak Fermi level pinning enables effective tuning of Schottky barrier,” Science Advances, vol. 2, no. 4, article e1600069, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Quhe, Y. Wang, M. Ye et al., “Black phosphorus transistors with van der Waals-type electrical contacts,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, no. 37, pp. 14047–14057, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller, “Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–50, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes forab initiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Physical Review B, vol. 54, no. 16, pp. 11169–11186, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 18, pp. 3865–3868, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. E. Blöchl, “Projector augmented-wave method,” Physical Review B, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 17953–17979, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, “From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method,” Physical Review B, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1758–1775, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Tkatchenko and M. Scheffler, “Accurate molecular van der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, no. 7, article 073005, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Shen, J.-C. Ren, X. Liu, S. Li, and W. Liu, “Van der Waals stacking induced transition from Schottky to Ohmic contacts: 2D metals on multilayer InSe,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 3110–3115, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Liu, J.-C. Ren, S. Zhang, M. Fuentes-Cabrera, S. Li, and W. Liu, “Ultrahigh conductivity in two-dimensional InSe via remote doping at room temperature,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 3897–3903, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Brandbyge, J.-L. Mozos, P. Ordejón, J. Taylor, and K. Stokbro, “Density-functional method for nonequilibrium electron transport,” Physical Review B, vol. 65, no. 16, article 165401, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. M. Kan, J. Y. Wang, X. W. Li et al., “Structures and phase transition of a MoS2 monolayer,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 1515–1522, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. F. Raffone, C. Ataca, J. C. Grossman, and G. Cicero, “MoS2 enhanced T-phase stabilization and tunability through alloying,” Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 2304–2309, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. E. H. Rhoderick, “Metal-semiconductor contacts,” IEE Proceedings I - Solid-State and Electron Devices, vol. 129, no. 1, p. 1, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Z. Zhang, K. Yao, Y. Liu et al., “Quantitative analysis of current–voltage characteristics of semiconducting nanowires: decoupling of contact effects,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 2478–2489, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Ahmed, M. S. Choi, X. Liu, and W. J. Yoo, “Carrier transport at the metal–MoS2 interface,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 9222–9228, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. K. Sarker and S. I. Khondaker, “Thermionic emission and tunneling at carbon nanotube–organic semiconductor interface,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 4993–4999, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. G. Louie and M. L. Cohen, “Self-consistent pseudopotential calculation for a metal-semiconductor interface,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 866–869, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. C. Gong, L. Colombo, R. M. Wallace, and K. Cho, “The unusual mechanism of partial Fermi level pinning at metal–MoS2 interfaces,” Nano Letters, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1714–1720, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. Si, Z. Lin, J. Zhou, and Z. Sun, “Controllable Schottky barrier in GaSe/graphene heterostructure: the role of interface dipole,” 2D Materials, vol. 4, no. 1, article 015027, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. Mott Nevill, “The theory of crystal rectifiers,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 171, no. 944, pp. 27–38, 1939. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Jia Liu et al. Exclusive Licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

 PDF Download Citation Citation
Altmetric Score