Research / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 7832610 | https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/7832610

Huaqing Huang, Feng Liu, "A Unified View of Topological Phase Transition in Band Theory", Research, vol. 2020, Article ID 7832610, 7 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/7832610

A Unified View of Topological Phase Transition in Band Theory

Received18 Feb 2020
Accepted06 May 2020
Published23 May 2020

Abstract

We develop a unified view of topological phase transitions (TPTs) in solids by revising the classical band theory with the inclusion of topology. Reevaluating the band evolution from an “atomic crystal” (a normal insulator (NI)) to a solid crystal, such as a semiconductor, we demonstrate that there exists ubiquitously an intermediate phase of topological insulator (TI), whose critical transition point displays a linear scaling between electron hopping potential and average bond length, underlined by deformation-potential theory. The validity of the scaling relation is verified in various two-dimensional (2D) lattices regardless of lattice symmetry, periodicity, and form of electron hoppings, based on a generic tight-binding model. Significantly, this linear scaling is shown to set an upper bound for the degree of structural disorder to destroy the topological order in a crystalline solid, as exemplified by formation of vacancies and thermal disorder. Our work formulates a simple framework for understanding the physical nature of TPTs with significant implications in practical applications of topological materials.

1. Introduction

Band theory is one of the most important developments of condensed matter and material physics, which underlines the working principle of modern electronic and optoelectronic devices. It is well known that isolated atomic levels would spread to form energy bands when atoms were brought together to form a solid [1], which provides a general band evolution process to understand metal, semiconductor, and insulator states. However, this classical textbook picture is incomplete and must be revised in light of recent emergence of band topology. In general, an insulating solid is a NI if it can be adiabatically connected (without gap closure or band inversion) to the “atomic limit”; otherwise, it is a TI [2]. Namely, the TPT from a NI to a TI requires a band inversion between conduction and valence bands [3]. This implies that ubiquitously, an intermediate TI phase should appear during the band evolution process when the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effect is included. A textbook-revised generic band evolution diagram is shown schematically in Figure 1 (see also Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials). Starting from the atomic limit (a NI), and levels are initially separated by a trivial charge gap . The level splits due to SOC effect. By reducing the average bond length (), the orbital levels spread to form individual bands with a finite bandwidth . Consequently, the charge gap reduces and closes eventually to realize an - band inversion. Then, the SOC effect reopens an energy gap with nontrivial topology, leading to a NI-to-TI TPT. Further reducing the average bond length to overcome the SOC gap will drive the system into a gapless phase before reaching a semiconducting phase with strong - hybridization. Therefore, a fundamental question is when and how the TPT occur within the framework of band theory.

The study of TPT dates back to 1970s when phenomena in quantum states of matter, such as the quantum Hall effect [4] and superfluid phase transitions in 2D [5], were explained using the mathematical concepts of topology [68]. These pioneering works have since paved the way for the introduction of many new topological states such as quantum anomalous/spin Hall effects [911], 3D TIs [12, 13] and topological superconductors [14], and revolutionized electron band theory [15]. Generally, topological states are insensitive to a smooth change of material parameters unless the system passes through a TPT. So far, various TIs with different band inversion mechanisms have been theoretically proposed and/or experimentally verified, either periodic [16, 17] or aperiodic [1822]. The critical condition of TPTs is determined on a case-by-case basis, but there is no unified view on the TPT among different systems. Fundamentally, it remains unclear how a TI is nonadiabatically connected to the “atomic limit” during the gap closure process.

It is important to recognize that conventional phase transitions, as described by Landau theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking, exhibit a universal scaling relation of criticality. Differently, TPTs, involving no symmetry breaking, are characterized by a sudden change of topological invariants with a continuously changing system parameter. Thus, one does not expect a form of universality to be associated with TPTs. Surprisingly, however, we discover a linear scaling relation between electron hopping potential and average bond length within the framework of band theory, which is commonly applicable to TPTs in different systems albeit with different slopes, i.e., without a universal scaling exponent as for conventional phase transitions. Based on a generic tight-binding (TB) model, we demonstrate this linear scaling relation to define the critical TPT point from the atomic limit to topological solid, regardless of lattice symmetry, periodicity, and form of electron hopping. We validate this linear scaling by calculating TPTs in various 2D crystalline lattices (oblique, trigonal, square, rectangle, rhombic, etc.) as well as quasicrystalline lattices. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this linear scaling sets an upper bound for the degree of disorder to destroy the topological order in a crystal by the case studies of vacancy formation and thermal disorder.

2. Model

Our TB model consists of three orbitals (, , and ) per site: where are electron creation operators on the orbital at the -th site and is the on-site energy of the orbital. is the hopping integral. is the SOC strength and is the Pauli matrix. We set a cutoff distance beyond which the hopping vanishes. Within the cutoff, follows the Slater-Koster scheme [23]. The radial dependence of the bond integral (with ) is captured by power-law or exponential decay functions in different materials [24, 25]. Since only the band inversion between and states of different parities is important for TPT, we focus on the 2/3 filling of electronic states hereafter (see Supplementary Materials for details).

We define the average bond length for a system with atomic sites as where the summation runs over all the bonds within the cutoff (i.e., ). It is worth noting that this expression is applicable to both crystalline and noncrystalline lattices, as discussed later.

3. Linear Scaling of TPT

As shown in Figure 1, the critical point of a TPT can be roughly determined by a critical bandwidth , which depends only on the given atomic levels and SOC strength, independent of lattice types. According to the deformation-potential theory [26, 27], the energy levels under strain are expressed as where are the deformation potentials for electrons in the valence and conduction bands, respectively. Similarly, we linearize the band evolution process with the bandwidth evolving with the average bond length as

Then, the energy gap is given by where is effectively the electron hopping potential which is related to the band-edge deformation potentials. Within the TB approximation, the bandwidth of different lattices is approximately proportional to the summation of the nearest-neighbor hopping integrals [1], which changes with the average bond length in equation (2). Then, the critical transition point of TPT where the gap closes () is simply determined by

Namely, the critical bond length is linearly proportional to the reciprocal of . As the average bond length is defined within the cutoff as presented in equation (2), the critical behavior of TPTs is mainly determined by the neighboring environment due to the “nearsightedness” of quantum-mechanical interactions [28].

4. TPTs in Crystal and Quasicrystal Lattices

To validate the above hypothesis, we first systemically calculated TPTs in various 2D periodic lattices. A trigonal lattice with an basis was found previously to host TI state, such as in Au/GaAs(111) and Bi/Si(111) systems [29, 30]. By tuning the average bond length , the trigonal lattice undergoes a TPT between a NI and a TI state accompanied by an energy gap closing and reopening. Figure 2(a) shows the critical values of the TPT for the trigonal lattice. In Figure 2(b), the orbital-resolved band structure indicates a nontrivial electronic topology beyond the TPT. It exhibits a band inversion around the point between the -orbital-derived conduction band and the -orbital-derived valence band. The calculated , which is obtained by directly tracing the evolution of 1D hybrid Wannier charge center [31], confirming the TI state in this region. Furthermore, similar TPTs have been found in various typical 2D lattices including oblique (monoclinic), rectangular (orthorhombic), rhombic or centered rectangular (orthorhombic), trigonal (hexagonal), square (tetragonal), honeycomb, Lieb, and semiregular Archimedean lattices (see Figures S3 and S4 in Supplementary Materials). For each lattice, we calculated the phase evolution diagram and determined .

Remarkably, we found that for more than 60 different lattices, exhibits a linear scaling with the reciprocal of , as shown in Figure 3. Numerical fitting gives a slope of , which implies that equation (6) is valid independent of specific lattice symmetries. We also check the results using an exponentially decay function for electron hopping, which importantly confirms that the linear scaling is valid for different hopping potentials (i.e., materials) albeit with a different slope (see also Figure S8 in Supplementary Materials). Thus, it is generally applicable but without a “universal” slope. We emphasize that the calculations cover almost all kinds of 2D crystalline lattices with different symmetries. More interestingly, the linear scaling is even applicable to quasicrystal lattices, as demonstrated by examples of Penrose-type pentagonal [20, 21] and Ammann-Beenker-type octagonal [22] quasicrystalline lattices, as also shown in Figure 3. This points to a general linear scaling of TPT in all the 2D systems, regardless of not only lattice symmetry but also periodicity.

5. TPTs in Crystals with Disorder

As the definition of and is the same for both crystalline and noncrystalline systems, one expects the linear scaling to be also applicable to define TPT in crystals with disorder. It is well known that the conducting edge state of a TI is distinguished from a normal metallic state by topological protection, so that the former is robust against nonmagnetic “edge” disorder (defects or impurities). It is rooted in the bulk-boundary correspondence of a TI phase, as edge disorder cannot destroy bulk band topology. However, if bulk disorders occurred in a TI, bulk band topology and hence topological edge state could be destroyed. Thus, an intriguing and practically useful question is how robust a TI can be against bulk disorder. Below we will answer this question by applying the linear scaling of TPT to 2D crystals with two kinds of possible bulk disorder, formation of vacancies and thermal displacements.

We again considered a trigonal lattice with random vacancies in a wide range of concentration (see Figure 4(a) for example) and studied the TPT induced by decreasing . As shown in Figure 4(b), TPTs between NI and TI states may occur for different vacancy concentration, and the critical point decreases with increasing . Correspondingly, the region of the TI phase becomes smaller with increasing and eventually disappears beyond a critically large . Figure 4(c) shows the phase diagram in the parameter space. Apparently, the NI and TI phases are divided by a curve of zero energy gap. In order to confirm the TPT, we calculated the spin Bott index, a topological invariant we developed recently for TI systems with disorder [2022]. It is found that there is a concomitant sharp jump in the spin Bott index across the phase boundary, confirming a TPT.

In addition, there is a large region of parameters in and where the system is gapless, as shown in Figure 4(c). An important point is that there is a critical vacancy concentration below which a TI phase can only exist. The TI region shrinks and disappears at , which defines an upper bound for TPT in a 2D trigonal lattice with vacancies. This is expected to be a general phenomenon although the precise value of depends on specific model parameters. For , the system is driven from a NI into a gapless phase through the intermediate TI region with the decreasing , while for , there is no TI region no matter how small is. We also investigated the samples with different sizes and found similar phase transitions. This confirms the applicability of the linear scaling of TPT in the thermodynamic limit of infinite lattice size.

We next investigate the effect of thermal disorder in destroying the topological phase in a 2D crystal. Due to thermal fluctuation, the interatomic distance varies locally, which broadens the discrete peaks of the radial distribution function. It is noted that the melting transition from perfect crystalline to paracrystalline [32] and amorphous lattices [33] with increasing thermal fluctuation can be complicated. As an illustrative example, we adopted the quasilattice model [33] which assumes that the atomic displacements () away from their equilibrium positions follow a Gaussian distribution:

The mean-squared displacement , which represents the strength of thermal fluctuation, is approximately proportional to temperature according to the compressibility equation [34, 35]. By increasing temperature , the lattice transforms from a crystal to an amorphous gradually. We studied the TPT in trigonal lattices with thermal fluctuation-induced bond disorder (see Figure 4(d)). As shown in Figure 4(e), the energy gaps for the TI region decrease and eventually disappear with increasing , indicating that the thermal disorder can actually destroy the nontrivial topology. Surprisingly, of TPT increases with increasing . Figure 4(f) shows the phase diagram of the thermal disorder system in the -σ parameter space. The NI and TI states are separated by a curve of zero energy gap. In strongly disordered region, i.e., which represents an upper bound of thermal disorder for TPT, the intermediate TI phase disappears and the phase transition occurs between a NI and a gapless state directly. According to the Lindemann melting criterion, the solid melts when exceeds a threshold value typically between 5% and 20% of the NN distance) [36]. Therefore, our results suggest the persistence of topological states even above melting temperature, i.e., the possible existence of “topological liquid.”

Finally, we add the critical transition points () for TPTs of both random-vacancy and thermal-disorder lattices into Figure 3. Remarkably, they follow the same linear scaling relation as obtained above for various crystal and quasicrystal lattices.

6. Discussion

We note that the linear scaling as discovered by TB calculations and analyses from the “atomic limit” to TI is physically related to the well-known concept of deformation potential [26, 27] underlying the linear dependence of semiconductor band gap on external strain. This implies that by measuring the band gap as a function of strain (a manifestation of average bond length ) for a chosen semiconductor, one will be able to predict the critical point for TPT in the band evolution diagram (Figure 1) as well as how much strain is needed to convert this semiconductor into a TI. We are currently exploring this interesting possibility. Furthermore, the linear scaling will help us to better understand the physical nature of TPTs in terms of local atomic environment. There exists a critical atomic density below which the average bond length is too large so that the topological state would never occur [18, 19]. Experimentally, our finding suggests that topological states can be quite robust against a high degree of structural disorder that usually occurs during a nonequilibrium growth process. This may significantly ease the fabrication of topological materials for practical applications.

Finally, it is interesting to note that for crystals one can identify whether it is a TI by symmetry analysis of band topology to determine if TPT has occurred by linking the solid crystal to the atomic crystal assumed with the same symmetry, which have provided a powerful method to discover topological crystals [3739]. However, our studies show that the TPT occurs regardless of symmetry, i.e., symmetry is a convenient means to determine the TPT in crystals, but not a mandatory condition. In addition, with certain crystalline symmetry constraint, topological semimetals can also occur around the critical point in the band evolution diagram we proposed. Although the illustrative calculation in this work is based on a specific model, the essential band inversion mechanism is not limited to the and orbitals, and other types of band inversion mechanisms between different orbitals are also feasible to achieve similar phase evolution diagrams. The unified view we provide here is applicable to any TPT that is triggered by a band-inversion mechanism, such as 2D/3D NI to topological (crystalline) insulator and 2D NI to Chern insulator transitions. However, it should not apply to TPTs that do not involve band inversion, such as quantum Hall effect hosted by a topological flat band [40] or a transition from a Dirac semimetal to TI upon opening a SOC gap like in graphene. Our discovery may also shed light on understanding topological effects in other fields such as topological photonics [41], phononics [42], mechanics [43], metamaterials [44], and topolectrical circuits [45].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

H. Huang and F. Liu designed the project. H. Huang performed theoretical calculation, and all authors prepared the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by U.S. DOE-BES (Grant No. DE-FG02-04ER46148). This research used resources of the CHPC at the University of Utah and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Supplementary Materials

General band evolution; details of methodology; TPTs of two-dimensional crystals and quasicrystals; random vacancy; thermal fluctuation; validity of the linear scaling for different forms of electron hopping. Figure S1: schematic illustration of topological phase transition. Figure S2: the calculation of formation of band structure from discrete levels of isolated atoms by decreasing average bong length. Figure S3: five 2D Bravais lattices. Figure S4: the eight lattices based on semiregular Archimedean tilings. Figure S5: several decorated trigonal lattices. Figure S6: atomic model of the Penrose-type and the Ammann-Beenker-type quasicrystal lattices. Figure S7: the linear scaling relation in various 2D crystalline lattices using the power-law decay function (). Figure S8: the linear scaling relation in various 2D crystalline lattices using the exponentially decay function (). Table S1: the electron hopping potential and the critical bond length for TPT in typical 2D crystals and quasicrystal lattices. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. O. Madelung, Introduction to Solid-State Theory, vol. 2, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  2. D. Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators, Cambridge University Press, 2018. View at: Publisher Site
  3. H. Huang, Y. Xu, J. Wang, and W. Duan, “Emerging topological states in quasi-two-dimensional materials,” WIRES Computational Molecular Science, vol. 7, no. 4, article e1296, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, “New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized Hall resistance,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 494–497, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. R. Nelson and J. M. Kosterlitz, “Universal jump in the superfluid density of two-dimensional superfluids,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 1201–1205, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, “Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 405–408, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. D. M. Haldane, “Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: semiclassically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis Néel state,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 1153–1156, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, “Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in twodimensional systems,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1181–1203, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. D. M. Haldane, “Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 2015–2018, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, “Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, no. 14, article 146802, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, “Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1757–1761, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium: topological insulators,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 3045–3067, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1057–1110, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Sato and Y. Ando, “Topological superconductors: a review,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 80, no. 7, article 076501, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Bansil, H. Lin, and T. Das, “Colloquium: topological band theory,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 88, no. 2, article 021004, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Zhou, W. Ming, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Li, and F. Liu, “Epitaxial growth of large-gap quantum spin Hall insulator on semiconductor surface,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 40, pp. 14378–14381, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Reis, G. Li, L. Dudy et al., “Bismuthene on a SiC substrate: a candidate for a high-temperature quantum spin Hall material,” Science, vol. 357, no. 6348, pp. 287–290, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. P. Mitchell, L. M. Nash, D. Hexner, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, “Amorphous topological insulators constructed from random point sets,” Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 380–385, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Agarwala and V. B. Shenoy, “Topological insulators in amorphous systems,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, no. 23, article 236402, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Huang and F. Liu, “Quantum spin Hall effect and spin Bott index in a quasicrystal lattice,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 121, no. 12, article 126401, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Huang and F. Liu, “Theory of spin Bott index for quantum spin Hall states in nonperiodic systems,” Physical Review B, vol. 98, no. 12, p. 125130, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. Huang and F. Liu, “Comparison of quantum spin Hall states in quasicrystals and crystals,” Physical Review B, vol. 100, no. 8, article 085119, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, “Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem,” Physical Review, vol. 94, no. 6, pp. 1498–1524, 1954. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. A. Harrison, “New tight-binding parameters for covalent solids obtained using Louie peripheral states,” Physical Review B, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 5835–5843, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Y. Ren, J. D. Dow, and D. J. Wolford, “Pressure dependence of deep levels in GaAs,” Physical Review B, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 7661–7665, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Bardeen and W. Shockley, “Deformation potentials and mobilities in non-polar crystals,” Physical Review, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 72–80, 1950. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. Herring and E. Vogt, “Transport and deformation-potential theory for many-valley semiconductors with anisotropic scattering,” Physical Review, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 944–961, 1956. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. Prodan and W. Kohn, “Nearsightedness of electronic matter,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 33, pp. 11635–11638, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z. F. Wang, K.-H. Jin, and F. Liu, “Quantum spin Hall phase in 2D trigonal lattice,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, article 12746, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Q.-F. Liang, R. Yu, J. Zhou, and X. Hu, “Topological states of non-Dirac electrons on a triangular lattice,” Physical Review B, vol. 93, no. 3, article 035135, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, “Computing topological invariants without inversion symmetry,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 23, article 235401, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Hosemann and S. N. Bagchi, “The interference theory of ideal paracrystals,” Acta Crystallographica, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 612–614, 1952. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. H. March, R. A. Street, and M. P. Tosi, Amorphous Solids and the Liquid State, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  34. J. A. Prins and H. Petersen, “Theoretical diffraction patterns corresponding to some simple types of molecular arrangement in liquids,” Physica, vol. 3, no. 1-4, pp. 147–153, 1936. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. B. J. Yoon, M. S. Jhon, and H. Eyring, “Radial distribution function of liquid argon according to significant structure theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 6588–6591, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. F. Lindemann, “Uber die berechnung molekularer eigenfrequenzen,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 11, p. 609, 1910. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Z. Song et al., “Catalogue of topological electronic materials,” Nature, vol. 566, no. 7745, pp. 475–479, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Tang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wan, “Comprehensive search for topological materials using symmetry indicators,” Nature, vol. 566, no. 7745, pp. 486–489, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, “A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials,” Nature, vol. 566, no. 7745, pp. 480–485, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, “High-temperature fractional quantum Hall states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, no. 23, p. 236802, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Topological photonics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 821–829, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. He, X. Ni, H. Ge et al., “Acoustic topological insulator and robust one-way sound transport,” Nature Physics, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1124–1129, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. D. Huber, “Topological mechanics,” Nature Physics, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 621–623, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Paulose, B. G. Chen, and V. Vitelli, “Topological modes bound to dislocations in mechanical metamaterials,” Nature Physics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153–156, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer et al., “Topolectrical-circuit realization of topological corner modes,” Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 925–929, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Huaqing Huang and Feng Liu. Exclusive Licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

507 Views | 393 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation

Altmetric Attention Score

Find out more
 Sign up for content alerts