Get Our e-AlertsSubmit Manuscript
Research / 2022 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 |Article ID 9837012 | https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9837012

Jing Wang, Tao Feng, Jiaxin Chen, Jr-Hau He, Xiaosheng Fang, "Flexible 2D Cu Metal: Organic Framework@MXene Film Electrode with Excellent Durability for Highly Selective Electrocatalytic NH3 Synthesis", Research, vol. 2022, Article ID 9837012, 11 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9837012

Flexible 2D Cu Metal: Organic Framework@MXene Film Electrode with Excellent Durability for Highly Selective Electrocatalytic NH3 Synthesis

Received05 Jan 2022
Accepted13 Apr 2022
Published30 May 2022

Abstract

Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction to ammonia (ENRA) is an effective strategy to resolve environmental and energy crisis, but there are still great challenges to achieve high activity and stability synergistically for practical application in a fluid environment. The flexible film electrode may solve the abovementioned problem of practical catalytic application owing to the advantages of low cost, light weight, eco-friendliness, simple and scalable fabrication, extensive structural stability, and electrocatalytic reliability. Herein, 2D hybridization copper 1,4-benzenedi-carboxylate (CuBDC) has been grown on electronegative MXene nanosheets (Ti3C2Tx) seamlessly to prepare a 2D flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode for ENRA. The flexible electrode simultaneously exhibits high Faradaic efficiency (86.5%) and excellent stability for NH3 synthesis, which are comparable to previously reported nanomaterials toward ENRA. Especially, the flexible electrode maintains outstanding FENH3 toward ENRA after the bending, twisting, folding, and crumpling tests, indicating excellent electroconductibility, high stability, and durability. This work not only provides mild permeation-mediated strategy to fabricate a flexible electrode but also explores the practical applications of the electrode with effectively environmental adaptability in solving global environmental contamination and energy crisis by effective ENRA.

1. Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) is a potential hydrogen carrier due to its high energy density (4.32 kW·h/L) and storage capacity (17.6%) [1, 2]. However, it used to rely on the energy-intensive Haber−Bosch process (400–600°C, >400 atm) [3]. Recently, electrocatalytic N2 reduction reaction (NRR) has been demonstrated as a potential approach for NH3 generation [4] but a large amount of energy could be consumed to break the N≡N bond and the low solubility of N2 in water limited the progress of the NRR [5, 6]. The nitrate (NO3) is selected as the most viable N source for NH3 production due to its high solubility in water and lower energy consumption [7]. In addition, the NO3 is one of the most difficult N-pollutants to remove [810], which induces global eutrophication and does damage to the human health [11, 12]. Therefore, electrocatalytic NO3 reduction to NH3 (ENRA) is one of the most promising strategy for producing NH3 under ambient conditions and solving global NO3 contamination and energy crisis [13, 14]. However, owing to the fragile nature of a traditional electrode, the practical application of ENRA is limited by poor stability and lossy and even disappeared activity after omnidirectional deformability in a fluid environment [14]. Thus, the electrocatalytic NH3 synthesis using flexible electrode with effective electrocatalytic activity, high Faradaic efficiency, robust mechanical stability, and low environmental impacts would be a promising strategy to solve the abovementioned problem.

Recently, inspired by the increasing advantages of flexible fuel cell including being lightweight, portable, foldable/twistable, and wearable [15, 16], the two-dimensional (2D) materials have been reported as an ideal choice for constructing a flexible electrode because of the high aspect ratio of the nanostructure, with a transverse size expansion nanometer thickness [17]. Especially, the 2D MXenes have plenty of advantages for electrode preparation, such as high electrical conductivity, flexibility, and hydrophilicity [18, 19]. In addition, MXenes are a kind of materials that can change the electronegativity of the active metal center, thus regulating the performance of the electrode [20, 21]. In addition to the metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), it can serve as a metal center in the catalyst and is an important type of porous coordination compounds [22]. Moreover, 2D MOF nanosheets with the thicknesses of several nanometers are expected to provide the large exposure to active atoms, as well as fast ion mass transfer [17]. For example, 2D copper- (Cu-) based conductive MOF is reported for aqueous CO2 reduction reaction at low overpotentials with excellent catalytic activity [23], while NO3 reduction can also be catalyzed by the great potential of earth-abundant and cost-effective Cu-based electrode with high activity [24], which is comparable with scarce and high-cost noble metals [2527]. Thus, the incorporation of 2D Cu MOFs with MXenes could synchronously enhance the ENRA performance, stability, electrical conductivity, flexibility, and eco-friendliness of the electrode [28]. Despite the benefits and demands, there is no report involving flexible electrodes for ENRA.

Based on the abovementioned discussion, in this report, the flexible 2D CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrodes are designed by seamlessly coating the 2D CuBDC layer on the Ti3C2Tx film using a simple permeation-mediated strategy under mild conditions (40°C), which are used for ENRA for the first time. The 2D flexible film structure is conducive to produce fully exposed active sites in contact with reaction solution, resulting in outstanding electrocatalytic activity and rapid reaction rate. The flexible electrodes exhibit excellent ENRA performance and mechanical stability. The reaction pathway and mechanism are demonstrated through online differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS). The following advantages can be achieved through our design: (1) superior mechanical flexibility and outstanding ENRA performance as well as high cyclic stability of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, facilitating large-scale practical application of the flexible electrode; (2) comparable ENRA performance to noble metals, promoting their extensive commercialization due to the earth abundance and cost-effectiveness; (3) excellent stability and structural tunability after omnidirectional deformability of the flexible electrode-matching fluid environment for ENRA. For example, when the actual water flow changes greatly, the rigid electrode is easy to cause its efficiency reduction or even damage, while the flexible electrode with structural tunability can adapt to this environment well; and (4) free-standing and lightweight properties for portable electrocatalytic equipment.

2. Results and Discussion

The CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx composite system is synthesized via permeation-mediated strategy, and Ti3C2Tx nanosheets can be used as a template for the in situ 2D CuBDC growth. Firstly, the Ti3C2Tx was synthesized from the Ti3AlC2 precursor in an etching solution containing hydrochloric acid (HCl) and lithium fluoride (LiF) [18]. Further shaking the etched Ti3C2Tx resulted in a colloidal suspension of delaminated Ti3C2Tx nanosheets in the pipe. Then, the 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC) was placed in the bottom layer of the mixture of N, N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) and acetonitrile (CH3CN) solution. Ti3C2Tx nanosheets and Cu (NO3)2 were put on the upper layer of that solution, and these layers were separated vertically by an intermediate solvent layer according to different densities (Scheme 1). During static permeation, the functional groups (−OH and −F) on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets could absorb Cu2+ ions for the formation of Ti3C2Tx−Cu via the electrostatic interaction. Then, the Ti3C2Tx−Cu and H2BDC solutions permeated each other at the intermediate solvent layer where the CuBDC crystals grow slowly on the Ti3C2Tx. Finally, CuBDC growth is restricted by the absence of Ti3C2Tx−Cu which is in the latent organic phase and CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx nanosheets were removed from the reaction by gravity.

The successful preparation of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets is identified by the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (Figure 1(a), Figure S1), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Figure 1(d), Figure S2), STEM image, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mapping (Figure S3). The lattice spacing of ~2.6 Å is obtained from the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), which can be assigned to the (100) plane of Ti3C2Tx (Figure S4). The crystal structures of the exfoliated Ti3C2Tx nanosheets are confirmed by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern (Figure S5). A typical morphological observation by atomic force microscopy (AFM) indicates that the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets have lateral dimensions of several hundreds of nanometers with the thickness of ~3 nm (Figure S6), while the 2D CuBDC nanosheets exhibit a 2D-layered crystalline structure according to the SEM image (Figure 1(b)) and TEM image (Figure 1(e), Figure S7). The diffraction peaks observed in the XRD pattern further verify the crystal structure and composition of CuBDC (Figure 2(a)), which is in accordance with the previous report [17].

Because of the in situ growth of 2D CuBDC, the SEM image of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx displays the sheet-like morphology with surface roughness (Figure 1(c)). The TEM image of a hybridization nanosheet indicates that CuBDC is coated on the surfaces of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets seamlessly (Figure 1(f)). The AFM image shows square nanosheets with lateral dimensions of 0.6–3 μm and 8–12 nm thicknesses (Figure 1(g)). Furthermore, the STEM image with the corresponding EDS elemental mapping (Figure 1(h)) and the associated atom percentage spectrum (Figure S8 and Table S1) consistently confirm the successful synthesis of the 2D CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx with uniform distribution of Ti, Cu, C, and O elements throughout the nanosheets. In addition, bright particles presented in the STEM image of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx are Cu nanoparticles. CuBDC is a coordination structure that can be easily destroyed to form Cu nanoparticles under intense electron beam bombardment of STEM.

The XRD patterns of Ti3C2Tx, CuBDC, and CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx are depicted in Figure 2(a). The observed diffraction peaks of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx nanosheets located at 9.4, 11.7, 16.6, 28.8, and 42.4° are assigned to the (001), (222), (333), (442), and (882) planes of CuBDC, respectively [17, 29], while the peak located at 8.2° corresponds to the (002) plane of Ti3C2Tx [18]. Three of the samples are analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). As observed from TGA curves (Figure 2(b)), the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx sample exhibits better thermal stability than that of CuBDC alone, suggesting that the in situ grow strategy significantly enhances the structural stability of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the CuBDC and CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx reveal type-IV curves with a hysteresis loop (), indicating that the pores on the electrocatalysts are dominantly mesopores (Figure 2(c)). As shown in Figure 2(d), the pore size distribution of CuBDC obtained by the density functional theory (DFT) method displays the average pore size range of 3–13 nm. After seamlessly coating with Ti3C2Tx, the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx exhibits a trimodal pore size distribution. Except for the similar mesopores of CuBDC (3 and ~12 nm), the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx exhibits another mesopore with the size centered at ~20 nm. The results also show that CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx has larger surface areas of 161.45 m2/g than that of CuBDC (95.13 m2/g). As a result, the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx shows an enlarged porous structure and specific surface area, which are beneficial to provide plentiful active sites and increase the electrode/electrolyte contact area [30].

The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectrum of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx displays the main elements of C, O, Ti, and Cu, and the CuBDC and Ti3C2Tx also are measured as control (Figure S9). For CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, the C 1s spectrum of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx observes the presence of C−Ti (283 eV), C=C (285.6 eV), C−C (286.5 eV), C=O (288 eV), and O=C−O (289.7 eV) species (Figure 2(e)). Moreover, the O 1s spectrum detects the C=O (531 eV), O=C−O (532.4 eV), and −OH (533.6 eV) species (Figure 2(f)) [20]. Owing to the in situ growth of CuBDC on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, the change in C and O functional groups can be ignored, which is in line with the fact that Ti3C2Tx kept its structural integrity after CuBDC growth (Figure S10) [31]. Fittings of the Cu 2p peaks of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx results in the Cu2+ component with binding energy peaks located at 934.9 and 954.1 eV while the surface Cu+/Cu0 species are assigned to 933.4 and 952.7 eV (Figure 2(g)). The Ti 2p XPS spectra of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx indicate that Ti−C transferred to a higher bonding energy than the pristine Ti3C2Tx (456.2 and 461.8 eV to 459.6 and 465.2 eV) (Figure 2(h)) [21]. This result confirms that the valence state and surface functional groups of Ti in CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx are changed with the gradual growth of CuBDC on the Ti3C2Tx nanosheet, which suggests the strong interaction and charge transfer between Ti3C2Tx and CuBDC [32]. As the oxidation state of Ti can affect the electrical conduction and ENRA performance, Ti−O/Ti−C should be considered properly. To verify the oxidation state of Ti, we have discussed the Ti−O/Ti−C during the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx synthesis. Ti−O/Ti−C of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (21.4%) is lower than that of the origin Ti3C2Tx (8.2%), which is largely because the functional groups (−OH) on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets could absorb Cu2+ ions for the formation of Ti3C2Tx−Cu via the electrostatic interaction, and then, in situ CuBDC growth occurs. During the generation of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, part of oxygen-containing groups is occupied, resulting in a decrease in the content of Ti−O. Moreover, the electronic structures of CuBDC and CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx are investigated to identify their intrinsic activity on the electrocatalysis. Compared to pure CuBDC, the Cu 2p3/2 XPS spectrum of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx shifts to lower binding energy by 0.6 eV (Figure 2(i)), which indicates the electron transfer from Ti3C2Tx to Cu at the interface of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx. Therefore, it can be concluded that the higher electron density of Cu leads to a decrease in the barrier reaction and a competitive inhibition of H2 production [31], leading to excellent performances of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx for ENRA.

The electrochemical tests are executed in a double-compartment cell to evaluate the ENRA performance of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (Figure S11). Varied potentials from −0.3 to −0.8 vs RHE are applied to choose the optimum one to ensure high performance of ENRA. As shown in Figure 3(a), the maximum NO3 conversion efficiency (93.1%) and FENH3 (86.5%) are obtained at −0.7 V instead of −0.8 V vs RHE. This result can be attributed to the occurrence of excessive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) side reaction as indicated by literature results [33]. Thus, −0.7 V has been chosen as the operation voltage of subsequent batch experiment. As shown in Figure 3(b), the concentration of NH3 produced on the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx increases with the rapidly electrocatalytic reduction of NO3 below 10 mg·N/L (the maximum contaminant level limited by the World Health Organization [11]) within 50 min. As a comparison, the CuBDC electrode shows a significantly decreased NH3 product and Ti3C2Tx exhibits neglectful NH3 generation (Figure S12). When NO3 concentration increases from 50 to 200 mg·N/L, NH3 selectivity remains basically unchanged, which reveals that the concentration is applicable to a wide range of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (Figure 3(c)). The NH3 selectivity and Faradaic efficiency retain more than 80% after 10 cycles of ENRA on the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (Figure 3(d)). Ti−O/Ti−C of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx after ENRA reaction (9.3%) (Figure S13) is slightly higher than that of the origin CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (8.2%). In ENRA reaction, Ti may be oxidized by NO3 but the electrons generated in situ in the electrochemical process can further reduce it, thus maintaining the stable state of Ti, which is conducive to maintaining its strong conductivity and is more conducive to the ENRA reaction. These results consistently demonstrated the excellent ENRA performance, high durability, and long-term stability of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode.

Direct proof of NO3 to NH3 during the ENRA is acquired by the online DEMS system. When the applied voltages are varied from 0.1 to −0.9 V vs RHE, signals at m/z values of 46 (NO2), 30 (NO), 33 (NH2OH), and 17 (NH3) appear during four cycles (Figure 3(e)). The presence of m/z signals at 33 shows that typical fragments of NH2OH are detected, which is supported by the previous report [24]. m/z of 17 may come from evaporating water, but the water fragments do not change with electric potential. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the ENRA process can be traced with the above-obtained signals. Therefore, m/z of 17 is the signal confirming the formation of NH3. Based on the abovementioned results, it can be concluded that the reaction pathway of ENRA is as follows: NO3→NO2→NO→NH2OH→NH3.

With the addition of NO3, the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, CuBDC, and Ti3C2Tx all show the obvious increase in current density (Figure 4(a)). The CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx (−39.8 mA/cm2) appears higher current density than those of CuBDC (−24.9 mA/cm2) and Ti3C2Tx (−13.1 mA/cm2) at −1.0 V vs RHE. The fitting electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) data elucidate that the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx generates a smaller arc radius than the CuBDC after adding the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, pointing to remarkable improved charge transfer kinetics (Figure 4(b)). This result demonstrates that Ti3C2Tx is an ideal 2D nanomaterial to improve the electronic conductivity of the electrode. Compared with those of the Ti3C2Tx, the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx and CuBDC show obvious reduction and oxidation peaks (Figure S14). To reveal the advantages of the designed CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, the ENRA performances of the CuBDC and Ti3C2Tx are also conducted for comparison. As shown in Figure 4(c), the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx obtains higher NO3 conversion efficiency, NH3 selectivity, and FENH3 than CuBDC (51.6%, 22.3%, and 21.8%, respectively) and Ti3C2Tx (9.6%, 5.1%, and 5.3%, respectively). These contrasts consistently demonstrate that the in situ growth of CuBDC on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets not only provides plentiful active sites but also enhances electronic conductivity, leading to accelerated electron transfer and improved electrocatalytic activity for ENRA. In addition, the ENRA performance of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx is comparable to or even better than other previous reported electrodes (Table S2, S3) [3439].

Compared with the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, the LSV curves of CuBDC−Ti3C2Tx exhibit lower current density (Figure 4(d)) and the EIS measurements also show that the larger the arc radius, the worse the charge transfer kinetics (Figure 4(e)). Moreover, the physically mixed CuBDC−Ti3C2Tx shows typical overlap nanosheets (Figure S15) and significantly decreased NO3 conversion efficiency (50.7%), NH3 selectivity (23.3%), and Faradaic efficiency (22.8%) (Figure 4(f)). The LSV curves of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx show the obvious increase of the current density in the presence of NO3 in 0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolytes, but no current density is generated in the absence of NO3 (Figure S16). Furthermore, the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx produces higher current density than CuBDC and Ti3C2Tx electrodes with the addition of NO3 (Figure S17). These results consistently indicate that the flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode shows specific response to the NO3, leading to excellent ENRA performance.

Based on the abovementioned experimental results, the outstanding ENRA performances of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx may be due to the synergistic coupling effects of the 2D CuBDC and Ti3C2Tx components. The CuBDC provides plentiful active sites and porous structure while the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets provide a flexible support to prevent the aggregation of catalytic sites, thus increasing the exposure of active surfaces and pore structures. When the CuBDC@Ti3C2T is used for ENRA, the hydrophilic Ti3C2Tx assists in facilitating the easy access of NO3 to the Cu-active species (Figure S18) [32]. Moreover, the Ti3C2T provides high electronic density, which not only reduces the reaction barrier but also suppresses the competing HER [31]. Thus, the hybridization of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx can be used for highly selective electrocatalytic synthesis of NH3 with high Faradaic efficiency.

The mechanical flexibility of the flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode is quantitatively examined under various deformation modes. The flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode retains good ENRA performance after bending, twisting, and folding (Figure 5(a)). This result demonstrates that omnidirectional deformability of the electrode has almost no effect on the ENRA performance. The mechanical flexibility of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode is highlighted by comparing it with that of the mixed CuBDC-Ti3C2Tx on the C film (CuBDC-Ti3C2Tx-C). Notably, after folding and then unfolding, there is no significant change on the morphology and ENRA performance observed for the flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode, while the CuBDC-Ti3C2Tx-C is easily broken and loses electrocatalytic activity (Figure 5(b)). This result indicates that the seamless growth of 2D CuBDC on Ti3C2Tx nanosheets significantly improves mechanical flexibility for extending the electrocatalytic performance of the flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode. Moreover, the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx film still maintains high FENH3 after bending for 2400 cycles, which confirms that the flexible electrode has high stability and durability during application in the fluid environment (Figure 5(c)). As a result, the CuBDC layers provide fully exposed active centers and pore structure for ENRA while the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets endow the electrode with high electrical conductivity and mechanical flexibility, which enable the flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode to own highly electrocatalytic activity and cycling stability.

3. Conclusion

In summary, a flexible 2D free-standing CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrode with low resistance and tunable morphology is successfully prepared via permeation-mediated strategy. The fabricated film electrode owns the benefits of simple and scalable fabrication, excellent flexibility, extensive structural stability, low cost, light weight, and eco-friendliness for practical electrocatalytic application. The high NO3 conversion efficiency, NH3 selectivity, and Faradaic efficiency of ENRA are obtained on the flexible electrode, which are comparable to the nanocatalysts based on precious metals previously reported. In particular, the omnidirectional deformability of the film electrode has neglectful effect on the ENRA performance, indicating excellent flexibility, stability, and durability. The reaction mechanism and pathway of the ENRA are demonstrated by the analysis results of online DEMS. This CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx film exhibits a plentiful porous structure, large active surface area, high electrical conductivity, and superb mechanical flexibility, which can significantly improve the electrocatalytic activity and stability for effective environmental adaptability of the flexible electrode toward ENRA in the fluid environment.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Materials

Copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 99%), 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (H2BDC, 98%), sodium nitrate (NaNO3, 99%), sodium nitrite (NaNO2, 99%), ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, 99%), sodium sulfate (Na2SO4, 99%), acetylene black, acetonitrile (CH3CN, 99%), NaOH (96%), HCl (36-38%), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.5%), sulfamic acid, p-aminobenzenesulfonamide, N-(1-Naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride, phosphoric acid, trichloromethane (CHCl3, 99%), and Nessler’s reagent are from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. LiF (98.5%, 325 mesh, Alfa Aesar), Ti3AlC2 (98%, 400 mesh, 11 Technology Co. Ltd.), and all reagents were of analytical grade, and solutions were prepared by using ultrapure water (specific resistance of 18 MΩ cm).

4.2. Preparation of Ti3C2Tx Nanosheets

1 g of LiF was added into 20 mL 9 M HCl solution under stirring for 30 min. Subsequently, 1 g of Ti3AlC2 powder was slowly added into the solution in 5 minutes and the mixed solution was further stirred for 24 h at 40°C. After etching, the resultant solution was separated via centrifugation with washing (10 min at 3500 rpm), and then, the supernatant was decanted, followed by the addition of ultrapure water and 5 min handshaking. The washing process was repeated several times until the supernatant became dark-green and the pH was around 6.

4.3. Synthesis of CuBDC

A glass tube with 14 mm of the inner diameter was used to synthesize CuBDC nanosheets. Dissolve 30 mg H2BDC in 2 mL DMF and 1 mL CH3CN mixture at the bottom of the tube. In this solution, carefully add a mixture of 1 mL DMF and 1 mL CH3CN to prevent the premature mixture of the two solutions. Finally, 30 mg Cu(NO3)2·3H2O is dissolved in a mixture of 1 mL DMF and 2 mL CH3CN and carefully add it to the top layer tube. After leaving the tube to react in static conditions at 40°C for 24 h, the formation of a blue precipitate was observed at the bottom of the tube, which was collected by centrifugation at 8000 rpm and consecutively washed 3 times with 1 mL of DMF followed by another 3 times with 1 mL of CHCl3 and dried in a vacuum oven at 50°C for 12 h.

4.4. Fabrication of the Flexible CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx Electrode

The fabrication method for CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx was similar to that of the CuBDC, except that 10 mg of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets along with 30 mg Cu(NO3)2·3H2O was added to the top layer (mixture of 1 mL DMF and 2 mL of CH3CN).

4.5. Material Characterizations

The SEM (Gemini SEM 500), TEM (Talos F200X), STEM (Talos F200X) with EDS, and AFM measurement (Bruker Dimension Edge atomic force microscope) were conducted to investigate the morphologies of samples. XPS spectra (ESCALAB 250Xi) were measured using the Mg Kα line as the excitation source. XRD patterns (Bruker D8 ADVANCE) were recorded with an X-ray diffractometer. TGA (Waters Discovery) was introduced to determine the thermal properties in a N2 atmosphere in which the heating rate is 5°C/min. N2 adsorption–desorption data were obtained from the Micromeritics ASAP2020M analyzer. Density functional theory (DFT) is used to calculate the pore size distribution. The DEMS (QAS 100) data were collected in the online gas analysis.

4.6. Electrochemical Measurements

ENRA experiments were conducted on a three-electrode system in H-type membrane-separated electrolyte cells using a CHI 660D electrochemical workstation. Pt wire and Ag/AgCl electrodes were used as counter and reference electrode. All potentials in contrast to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) were recorded. Potential was converted to the : . LSV curves were performed at a rate of 100 mV/s from 0 to –1.0 V vs RHE. Current densities were standard in the geometrical area, and the AC impedance technique was employed to study the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) with the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, CuBDC, Ti3C2Tx, and CuBDC−Ti3C2Tx-based electrodes. The range of frequency was set from 100 MHz to 1000 Hz. Nitrate solutions (20 mL) with varied initial concentrations (50–200 mg·N/L) were prepared using 200 mg·N/L stock solution and then were added into the cathode cell. Na2SO4 (0.1 M) as the electrolyte was evenly distributed to the cathode and anode cell. Application of the Amperometric i-t technique was conducted at constant potential (ambient conditions within 90 minutes at −0.7 V vs RHE) [40]. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. ENRA experiments of CuBDC, Ti3C2Tx, and physical mixed CuBDC−Ti3C2Tx were performed as control to determine the superiority of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx electrodes under the same conditions.

Data Availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are presented in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiaosheng Fang, Jing Wang, and Tao Feng designed the project and experimented. Jing Wang, Tao Feng, and Jiaxin Chen prepared and characterized the materials. Jing Wang and Tao Feng wrote the manuscript supported by Xiaosheng Fang and Jr-Hau He. Jiaxin Chen, Ziliang Li, and Hui Liu revised the article. All authors contributed to the data analysis and discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Drs. Ziliang Li and Hui Liu for their valuable discussions. This work is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (nos. 2018YFA0703700 and 2017YFA0204600), National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 12061131009 and 51872050), and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (nos. 21520712600 and 19520744300).

Supplementary Materials

Determination of NO3-N, determination of NO2-N, determination of NH3-N, and calculation of the conversion rate, selectivity, and Faradaic efficiency. Figure S1: the SEM image of the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S2: the TEM image of the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S3: the SEM image and corresponding EDS elemental mapping of Ti, C, O, F, and element overlay of the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S4: the HRTEM image of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets with the corresponding SAED pattern. Figure S5: XRD pattern of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S6: AFM pattern of the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S7: the TEM image of the CuBDC nanosheets. Figure S8: EDS spectrum of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S9: the XPS survey spectra of CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, Ti3C2Tx, and CuBDC witness the main elements of Ti, C, O, and Cu. Figure S10: the XPS analysis of Ti3C2Tx including the (a) C 1s, (b) Ti 2p, (c) O 1s, and (d) F 1s spectra. Figure S11: the photo of double-compartment cell for electrocatalytic nitrate reduction to ammonia based on the flexible 2D CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx film electrode. Figure S12: the time-dependent concentration change of NO3 and NH3 for ENRA reaction based on the (a) CuBDC and (b) Ti3C2Tx electrodes. Figure S13: the XPS comparison spectra of Ti 2p in CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx after ENRA. Figure S14: the CV plots of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx, CuBDC, and Ti3C2Tx electrodes. Figure S15: the TEM image of the CuBDC−Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Figure S16: the LSV curves of the electrodes modified by CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx in 0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolytes with or without NO3 (100 mg·N/L). Figure S17: LSV curves of (a) CuBDC and (b) Ti3C2Tx in 0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolytes with or without NO3 (100 mg·N/L). Figure S18: schematic illustration of the possible reaction pathways at CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx for ENRA. Table S1: the atom percentage of the CuBDC@Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Table S2: comparison of ammonia selectivity by electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reported in the literatures. Table S3: comparison of FENH3 and NH3 yield rates by electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reported in the literatures. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. B. H. R. Suryanto, H.-L. Du, D. Wang, J. Chen, A. N. Simonov, and D. R. MacFarlane, “Challenges and prospects in the catalysis of electroreduction of nitrogen to ammonia,” Nature Catalysis, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 290–296, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Hollevoet, M. De Ras, M. Roeffaers, J. Hofkens, and J. A. Martens, “Energy-efficient ammonia production from air and water using electrocatalysts with limited Faradaic efficiency,” ACS Energy Letters, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1124–1127, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Ren, Z. Mei, S. Zheng et al., “Wavelength-dependent solar N2 fixation into ammonia and nitrate in pure water,” Research, vol. 2020, article 3750314, p. 12, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Wang, Y. Chen, R. Fan et al., “Selective electrochemical reduction of nitrogen to ammonia by adjusting the three-phase interface,” Research, vol. 2019, article 1401209, p. 12, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. X. Cui, C. Tang, and Q. Zhang, “A review of electrocatalytic reduction of dinitrogen to ammonia under ambient conditions,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 8, no. 22, article 1800369, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Liu, M. Cheng, Z. He et al., “Pothole-rich ultrathin WO3 nanosheets that trigger N≡N bond activation of nitrogen for direct nitrate photosynthesis,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 731–735, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. V. Rosca, M. Duca, M. T. De Groot, and M. T. Koper, “Nitrogen cycle electrocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 2209–2244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Gruber and J. N. Galloway, “An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle,” Nature, vol. 451, no. 7176, pp. 293–296, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. E. Canfield, A. N. Glazer, and P. G. Falkowski, “The evolution and future of Earth’s nitrogen cycle,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6001, pp. 192–196, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Wang, Z. Deng, T. Feng, J. Fan, and W. X. Zhang, “Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) encapsulated within tubular nitride carbon for highly selective and stable electrocatalytic denitrification,” Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 417, article 129160, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  11. J. Wang, L. Ling, Z. Deng, and W. X. Zhang, “Nitrogen-doped iron for selective catalytic reduction of nitrate to dinitrogen,” Science Bulletin, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 926–933, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Lan, H. Luo, Y. Ma, Y. Hua, T. Liao, and J. Yang, “Synergy between copper and iron sites inside carbon nanofibers for superior electrocatalytic denitrification,” Nanoscale, vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 10108–10115, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Barrabés and J. Sá, “Catalytic nitrate removal from water, past, present and future perspectives,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 104, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Wang, T. Feng, J. Chen et al., “Electrocatalytic nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonia synthesis using metal nanocatalysts and bio-inspired metalloenzymes,” Nano Energy, vol. 86, article 106088, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. Li, M. K. Joshi, J. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and X. Fang, “Mechanically compatible UV photodetectors based on electrospun free-standing Y3+-doped TiO2 nanofibrous membranes with enhanced flexibility,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 52, article 2005291, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. Li, F. Davar, J. Chen, Z. Li, and X. Fang, “CdS/CdSO4 nanoflower-based photodetector with enhanced photoelectric performances,” ACS Applied Nano Materials, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 10190–10199, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Rodenas, I. Luz, G. Prieto et al., “Metal-organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation,” Nature Materials, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Chen, Z. Li, F. Ni, W. Ouyang, and X. Fang, “Bio-inspired transparent MXene electrodes for flexible UV photodetectors,” Materials Horizons, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1828–1833, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. Song, J. Chen, Z. Li, and X. Fang, “Self-powered MXene/GaN van der Waals heterojunction ultraviolet photodiodes with superhigh efficiency and stable current outputs,” Advanced Materials, vol. 33, no. 27, article e2101059, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Zhao, B. Dong, S. Li et al., “Interdiffusion reaction-assisted hybridization of two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks and Ti3C2Tx nanosheets for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 5800–5807, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Cui, R. Cheng, H. Zhang et al., “Ultrastable MXene@Pt/SWCNTs’ nanocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, no. 47, article 2000693, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Feng, Y. Wang, Y. N. Wu, D. M. Kabtamu, K. László, and F. Li, “A feasible linker transformation strategy towards the formation of Cu2O nanoparticles for immobilization in hierarchical CuBTC for adsorption desulfurization,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 8678–8683, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Majidi, A. Ahmadiparidari, N. Shan et al., “2D copper tetrahydroxyquinone conductive metal–organic framework for selective CO2 electrocatalysis at low overpotentials,” Advanced Materials, vol. 33, no. 10, article 2004393, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Wang, W. Zhou, R. Jia, Y. Yu, and B. Zhang, “Unveiling the activity origin of a copper-based electrocatalyst for selective nitrate reduction to ammonia,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 59, no. 13, pp. 5350–5354, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. Li, G. Zhan, J. Yang et al., “Efficient ammonia electrosynthesis from nitrate on strained ruthenium nanoclusters,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 142, no. 15, pp. 7036–7046, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Yang, P. Sebastian, M. Duca, T. Hoogenboom, and M. T. Koper, “pH dependence of the electroreduction of nitrate on Rh and Pt polycrystalline electrodes,” Chemical Commmunications, vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 2148–2151, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J.-X. Liu, D. Richards, N. Singh, and B. R. Goldsmith, “Activity and selectivity trends in electrocatalytic nitrate reduction on transition metals,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 7052–7064, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Park, A. C. Hinckley, Z. Huang et al., “Synthetic routes for a 2D semiconductive copper hexahydroxybenzene metal-organic framework,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 140, no. 44, pp. 14533–14537, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. G. Carson, K. Hardcastle, J. Schwartz et al., “Synthesis and structure characterization of copper terephthalate metal-organic frameworks,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2009, no. 16, pp. 2338–2343, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Q. Zhang, F. Yue, L. Xu, C. Yao, R. D. Priestley, and S. Hou, “Paper-based porous graphene/single-walled carbon nanotubes supported Pt nanoparticles as freestanding catalyst for electro-oxidation of methanol,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 257, article 117886, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. P. Li, M. Wang, X. Duan et al., “Boosting oxygen evolution of single-atomic ruthenium through electronic coupling with cobalt-iron layered double hydroxides,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1711, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. Y. Ma, J. L. Cao, M. Jaroniec, and S. Z. Qiao, “Interacting carbon nitride and titanium carbide nanosheets for high-performance oxygen evolution,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1138–1142, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Xu, J. Wu, W. Luo, Q. Li, W. Zhang, and J. Yang, “Dendritic cell-inspired designed architectures toward highly efficient electrocatalysts for nitrate reduction reaction,” Small, vol. 16, no. 30, article e2001775, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Wang, M. Li, C. Feng et al., “Ti nano electrode fabrication for electrochemical denitrification using Box- Behnken design,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 773, pp. 13–21, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. Li, K. Li, C. Chen, Q. Tang, T. Sun, and J. Jia, “Electrochemical removal of nitrate using a nanosheet structured Co3O4/Ti cathode: effects of temperature, current and pH adjusting,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 237, article 116485, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Mattarozzi, S. Cattarin, N. Comisso et al., “Electrochemical reduction of nitrate and nitrite in alkaline media at CuNi alloy electrodes,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 89, pp. 488–496, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. D. Yin, Y. Liu, P. Song et al., “In situ growth of copper/reduced graphene oxide on graphite surfaces for the electrocatalytic reduction of nitrate,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 324, article 134846, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. Chen, H. Wang, Y. Zhao et al., “Achieving high-performance nitrate electrocatalysis with PdCu nanoparticles confined in nitrogen-doped carbon coralline,” Nanoscale, vol. 10, no. 40, pp. 19023–19030, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W. Li, C. Xiao, Y. Zhao, Q. Zhao, R. Fan, and J. Xue, “Electrochemical reduction of high-concentrated nitrate using Ti/TiO2 nanotube array anode and Fe cathode in dual-chamber cell,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 146, no. 12, pp. 2585–2595, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Zhang, S. Zhao, Y. Xu et al., “Nitrate stimulates anaerobic microbial arsenite oxidation in paddy soils,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 4377–4386, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2022 Jing Wang et al. Exclusive Licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

 PDF Download Citation Citation
Views136
Downloads154
Altmetric Score
Citations