Get Our e-AlertsSubmit Manuscript
Research / 2022 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 |Article ID 9862980 | https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9862980

Kunming Shi, Bin Chai, Haiyang Zou, Daomin Min, Shengtao Li, Pingkai Jiang, Xingyi Huang, "Dielectric Manipulated Charge Dynamics in Contact Electrification", Research, vol. 2022, Article ID 9862980, 12 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9862980

Dielectric Manipulated Charge Dynamics in Contact Electrification

Received05 Nov 2021
Accepted06 Jan 2022
Published01 Feb 2022

Abstract

Surface charge density has been demonstrated to be significantly impacted by the dielectric properties of tribomaterials. However, the ambiguous physical mechanism of dielectric manipulated charge behavior still restricts the construction of high-performance tribomaterials. Here, using the atomic force microscopy and Kelvin probe force microscopy, an in situ method was conducted to investigate the contact electrification and charge dynamics on a typical tribomaterial (i.e., BaTiO3/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite) at nanoscale. Combined with the characterization of triboelectric device at macroscale, it is found that the number of transferred electrons increases with contact force/area and tends to reach saturation under increased friction cycles. The incorporated high permittivity BaTiO3 nanoparticles enhance the capacitance and electron trapping capability of the nanocomposites, efficiently inhibiting the lateral diffusion of electrons and improving the output performance of the triboelectric devices. Exponential decay of the surface potential is observed over monitoring time for all dielectric samples. At high BaTiO3 loadings, more electrons can drift into the bulk and combine with the induced charges on the back electrode, forming a large leakage current and accordingly accelerating the electron dissipation. Hence, the charge trapping/storing and dissipating, as well as the charge attracting properties, should be comprehensively considered in the design of high-performance tribomaterials.

1. Introduction

Contact electrification brings about charge transfer between two materials during contact or friction process [13], and this universally existing phenomenon is also considered to be derived from the difference of work functions or surface potentials between the contacting materials [46]. Though the triboelectric charges are commonly regarded to be detrimental for electronic circuits and systems, they have been successfully utilized in today’s advanced technologies, including photocopying [7], laser printing [8], electrostatic separation [9], painting [10], field-effect transistor [1113], and mechanical energy harvesting [1416].

In the field of energy harvesting, triboelectric devices, a new sustainable power source based on contact electrification and electrostatic induction effect, can convert ambient mechanical energy to electrical energy [1721]. The triboelectric charges on material surface serve as an electrostatic induction source to generate electricity, and the output voltage and current are both dictated by surface charge density [22, 23]. Hence, boosting the amount of triboelectric charge during contact electrification is essential for the improvement of triboelectric device performance. The dielectric properties of the tribomaterials play a key role in triboelectric performance [2426]. Organic dielectrics-based devices exhibit a limited output performance owing to their relatively low permittivity. Incorporating high permittivity (high-) fillers into the polymer matrix has been demonstrated to be efficient to improve the surface charge density and triboelectric performance [2731]. Though this strategy has been well established in the construction of tribomaterials, the physical interpretation of dielectric manipulated charge dynamics (charge transfer, charge distribution, and charge dissipation) still remain ambiguous, which restricts the further optimization of tribomaterials. To figure out the mechanism of dielectric manipulation, quantitative investigation of the in situ contact electrification and charge dynamics on the tribomaterials surface at nanoscale is required, as the regular macroscopic experiments cannot accurately control the electrification process or directly reveal the electrification interface [32].

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a high-precision instrument, which can characterize a variety of material properties at nanoscale for multifarious applications [33]. Due to the advantage of precise control of contact force, area, and friction cycle of the tip on the sample, contact electrification can be achieved and accurately controlled in the contact mode of AFM [34, 35]. Furthermore, with a high resolution, the Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) can detect the surface potential in real time, which can be utilized to interpret surface charges [36, 37]. Thus, the charge transfer, charge distribution and the subsequent charge dissipation processes on the dielectric surface can be systematically investigated via the combination of AFM and KPFM techniques.

Herein, contact electrification and charge dynamics at nanoscale are in situ and quantitatively investigated for a metal-dielectric case using AFM and KPFM, as a function of barium titanate nanoparticles (BTO NPs) density inside poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-trifluoro-ethylene) (PVDF-TrFE). In the nanocomposites, PVDF-TrFE has tremendous charge-attracting and transfer properties, while high- BTO nanoparticle owns a high internal polarization and excellent charge trapping capability. Mechanical conditions of contact force and friction cycle are studied on the spin coating PVDF-TrFE sample as they can significantly affect the charge transfer during contact electrification. Particularly, BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites with different dielectric properties are fabricated and characterized to demonstrate the dielectric manipulation on the charge transfer, distribution, and dissipation processes. The triboelectric performance of the macroscopic devices was also investigated to obtain a comprehensive analysis and understanding. A proposed mechanism is finally exhibited to elucidate the dielectric manipulated charge dynamics and surface charge density.

2. Results and Discussion

Figure 1(a) illustrates the experimental procedure via AFM and KPFM techniques. Briefly, the sample was primarily scanned by KPFM for a pristine surface potential; subsequently, the contact mode of AFM was switched for an in situ contact electrification in a relatively small area. Finally, the surface potential of the sample was immediately detected again by KPFM at the initial large size. Figure 1(b) shows the surface morphology of PVDF-TrFE sample and the characterized area of surface potential () and contact electrification (). Basically, surface potential (i.e., contact potential difference (CPD)) of the sample was determined by two components: work function of the sample and electrostatic charges on the sample [32]. To exclude the different surface properties of the samples, the surface potential after contact electrification was subtracted by the one measured before contact electrification. Thus, the difference value, termed as ΔCPD in this work, can directly demonstrate the influence of contact electrification on the surface potential.

As contact electrification can be affected by mechanical conditions [38, 39], Figure 1(c) shows the ΔCPD of PVDF-TrFE sample under different contact forces (directly proportional to the deflection setpoint, detail calculation shown in experimental section). It can be seen that the sample was negatively charged during contact electrification, indicating the electron transfer from tip to sample due to the electron transfer dominated mechanism in the metal/dielectric pairs [4043]. It is worth noting that the negatively charged area of the sample is larger than the rubbed area; this phenomenon can be ascribed to the fact that the electrons diffuse from the rubbed area to adjacent area through the plane, radially [44]. Despite the electron diffusion, the sample demonstrates the highest ΔCPD in the rubbed area after contact electrification, which can be also distinguished from the ΔCPD profiles in Figure 1(e). In addition, the ΔCPD of the sample, in either a rubbed area or adjacent area, is more negative under a higher deflection setpoint, and the peak ΔCPD increases with deflection setpoint (Figure S1a). This is because a larger contact force leads to a larger contact area between tip and sample at nanoscale, thus facilitating the transfer of more electrons to sample. The investigation of repeated charge injection was conducted by varying the number of friction cycle under the deflection setpoint of 0.5 V. On the sample, the distance between each rubbed area for a fixed friction cycle number (e.g., 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12) is larger than 100 μm. As shown in Figures 1(d) and 1(f), the ΔCPD of PVDF-TrFE increases along with the number of friction cycle, suggesting that electrons are transferred to the sample at each friction cycle, and high charge density can be achieved by multi-friction. Particularly, the ΔCPD dominated by triboelectric charges increases at a slowing rate. The peak ΔCPD in Figure S1b reveals that the electrons accumulate fast at a low number of friction cycle and tend to reach saturation at a high number of friction cycle. The reduced increasing rate of ΔCPD can be understood that the accumulated electrons could change the “effective work function” of the sample and inhibit the injection of more electrons [32].

To further certify the influence of mechanical condition, the contact electrification at macroscale was conducted by assembling Al foil and dielectric PVDF-TrFE film into a triboelectric device, as displayed in Figure 1(g). The contact electrification of the metal/dielectric pair was controlled by a liner motor with a force sensor. Under the operating frequency of 1 Hz, both the output current and the calculated transferred charge shown in Figure 1(h) increase along with the contact force in the range of 1 N-20 N. Otherwise, the output current of the device (1 Hz, 20 N) is plotted in Figure 1(i) as a function of measuring time. With the increasement of measuring time, the corresponding current and transferred charge increase and reach to saturation, gradually. These results concluded from both microscopic and macroscopic measurements are consistent with each other.

Dielectric properties of tribomaterials are crucial factors that affecting contact electrification [26, 45, 46]. To reveal the effect of dielectric properties on the charge dynamics, a series of nanocomposites based on BTO/PVDF-TrFE have been prepared. Figure 2(a) schematically illustrates the BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite and the microinterface forming between BTO NPs and PVDF-TrFE matrix. The hierarchical interface consisting of bonded layer, bounded layer, and loose layer has tremendous impact on nanoparticle surface states, polymer chain configurations, inorganic/organic compatibility, and local interfacial electrical and dielectric behaviors [4749]. The surface morphology of BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite shows the uniform dispersion of BTO NPs in PVDF-TrFE matrix, indicating their good compatibility. XRD in Figure 2(b) demonstrates both the characteristic peaks of BTO and PVDF-TrFE without any impurity and reveals the polar β phase-dominated crystallization in PVDF-TrFE [50].

Dielectric properties of the nanocomposites were investigated in range of 103-106 Hz at room temperature. As shown in Figure 2(c), the dielectric constant of PVDF-TrFE is 11.0 at 103 Hz, while the dielectric constant of the nanocomposites increases with increasing BTO content and achieves a high value of 20.1 at 103 Hz with a BTO content of 30 wt%. The dielectric loss of the nanocomposites is almost the same with PVDF-TrFE at high frequency, just a slight increase at low frequency (Figure S2). The increased dielectric constant of the nanocomposites relates to their enhanced capability of electric polarization, which facilitates the charge induction on the back electrode (schematically shown in Figure S3) [28]. Figure 2(d) shows that the polarization increases with electric field and BTO content. The 30 wt% BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite forms a 4.2 times stronger polarization (33.8 mC m−2) than that of PVDF-TrFE (8.1 mC m−2) under an electric field of 50 MV m−1. Otherwise, contact electrification consists of three subprocesses: charge generation, charge storage, and charge loss [51]. The dielectric constant is directly proportional to the capacitance and capability of the friction layer in storing charges, which is a determinant of surface charge density [51, 52], while, as a detrimental factor, leakage current forming across the friction layer could significantly decrease the surface charge density [28, 44, 53]. As displayed in Figure 2(e), the leakage current density of the nanocomposites increases along with BTO content under the electric field of 0-10 MV m−1, which may be caused by BTO NPs aggregation, interface overlapping, and the increasement of introduced defects.

Contact electrification on dielectric manipulated nanocomposites was carried out using the in situ technique, and the charge dynamic was investigated via repeatedly recording the surface potential distribution of the nanocomposites every 4 min after contact electrification (deflection setpoint: 0.5 V, friction cycle: 4). As shown in Figure 3(a), ΔCPD of the nanocomposite varies with BTO content, and all decrease along with the monitoring time, which also can be seen from the ΔCPD distribution profiles extracted from the same cross-section of each image in Figure 3(b). Comparing the ΔCPD measured at 0 min of each nanocomposite, the negatively charged area becomes smaller with BTO content increasing from 0 wt% to 30 wt%. In Figure 4(a), one can see that the half width at a full maximum of the ΔCPD profile and the surface potential of adjacent area decrease along with BTO content. To quantitatively analyze the degree of charge diffusion on the sample surface, the ΔCPD profiles were fit with Gaussian distribution function :

In equation (1), is the offset and magnitude constant for , respectively, and is the distribution width of the Gaussian function, which represents the degree of charge diffusion. In Figure 4(b), the value of decreases from 3.0 to 1.3, even to 0.88 at a higher BTO content of 40 wt% (Figure S4). The result indicates that electron diffusion from rubbed area to adjacent area can be inhibited by the addition of BTO NPs, efficiently. It is ascribed to the fact that high- BTO NPs can greatly enhance the interfacial polarization and capacitance of the nanocomposite, leading to a high capability to store/sustain the generated electrons at local surface [51]. Meanwhile, charge trapping sites in the nanocomposites can significantly influence the surface charge [54].

To evaluate the trap distributions in the nanocomposites, temporal distributions of surface potentials of the nanocomposites after being negatively charged were investigated, and the theoretical model of isothermal surface potential decay (ISPD) [55, 56] was applied to calculate charge trap density versus the charge trap energy. In Figure 4(c), the surface potential of all nanocomposites presents an exponential decay, which is due to the fact that the captured charges in the traps can escape via the thermionic-emission effect [57, 58] and then drift to the back electrode via a self-excited electric field. In addition, the injected charges in shallow traps can be easy to escape, thus leading to a rapid ΔCPD decay at early stage, while the injected charges in deep traps are difficult to escape, thus leading to a slow ΔCPD decay at last stage [55, 59]. The cross-over phenomenon of the decay curves is caused by the different initial surface potential and different charge decay rates of the samples [59]. Figure 4(d) shows the trap distribution of the nanocomposites analyzed via the model of ISDP. One can see that PVDF-TrFE exists two peaks at 0.88 eV and 0.94 eV, which corresponds to the energy level of shallow trap and deep trap in the semicrystalline polymer, respectively. After adding BTO NPs, both peaks move to a higher energy level, and the trap density increases along with BTO content, achieving a maximum value at a BTO content of 20 wt%. Upon the addition of BTO NPs, numerous matrix/nanoparticle interfaces with high potential barrier (especially for the bonded layer) are created in nanocomposites, which could efficiently trap the injected electrons and inhibit their migration via strong coulomb effect (Figures 4(e)-I), while excessive BTO NPs could lead to the overlapping of interfacial regions and the aggregation of BTO NPs, thus facilitating the charge migration in a longer rang and reducing the interfacial trap density (Figures 4(e)-II).

On the other hand, Figure 3 also shows that ΔCPD of all samples decay along with monitoring time, suggesting the charge dissipation occurs on the sample. Figure 4(f) depicts the peak ΔCPD of the nanocomposites decaying with monitoring time, exponentially. Generally, the charge dissipation can be ascribed to the following aspects [44]: (1)Ambient atmosphere and humidity(2)Charges diffusing laterally on the surface(3)Charges diffusing vertically into the bulk(4)Charges drifting to the electrode and combining with the induced charges on the electrode

At an ambient condition, charges can disperse into the atmosphere or combine with opposite charges from the atmosphere [44]. In addition, the humidity/moisture can create a water layer on the sample surface, which strongly increase the charge dissipation rate due to the screening of surface charges and improved surface conductivity for leakage [2, 4, 37, 44]. In terms of charge diffusion, the distribution width of the nanocomposites in Figure S5 keeping almost unchanged over the monitoring time indicates the insignificant lateral diffusion of electrons in ΔCPD decay. The lateral diffusion of electrons mainly occurs at initial instant of charge injection, due to the high concentration gradient of electrons on sample surface. However, the accumulated electrons on contact surface can induce positive charges on the back electrode, and the established electric field could enhance the vertical diffusion of electrons into the bulk [60]. Furthermore, the electrons drifting deep could combine with the induced positive charges on the back electrode and form the leakage current across the film, thus significantly decreasing the electron density on the sample surface [28, 53]. Generally, the exponential decay curves in Figure 4(f) follow the equation below: where denotes the attenuation component of ΔCPD, is the residual steady-state component of ΔCPD resulting from the tightly bound charges, and presents decay coefficient. It can be seen that the fitting lines are consistent with the measured data, and the ratio of to in Figure 4(g) tends to increase and then decrease with increasing BTO content, which means that the sample of 10 wt% BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite has a higher capability to retain electrons. Otherwise, the average decay rate of ΔCPD can be calculated by

In the equation, and are the measured at 0 min and min, respectively. The result in Figure 4(h) shows that 10 wt% BTO/PVDF-TrFE sample has the lowest average decay rate during all the monitoring time. This is because the addition of BTO NPs can increase the dielectric capacitance and electron trapping ability of the sample, while excessive BTO NPs can lead to an increment of leakage current in the nanocomposite, as shown in Figure 2(e), which would cancel out the triboelectric charges on the tribomaterial surface and the induced charges on the back electrode. Therefore, the two antagonistic impacts of adding high-k BTO NPs codetermine the surface charge density, thus leading to an optimal BTO content.

The characterization of triboelectric devices assembled by BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites is depicted in Figures 5(a)–5(d). To verify the charge dissipation on the dielectric surface, PVDF-TrFE-based device was investigated under different frequency. As can be seen in Figure 5(a), the output current of the device increases with operating frequency in the range of 0.05 Hz-2 Hz. The increased current has been attributed to the result of fast charge transfer, where the charge dissipation was not considered [61, 62]. In Figure 5(b), one can see that more charges were transferred at a higher frequency. Based on the above analysis, it can be easily understood that the device operating at a lower frequency could suffer a longer period for charge dissipation at each cycle. Therefore, high output performance can be achieved for the device operating at a relatively high frequency, due to the reduced charge dissipation on the tribomaterial after contact electrification.

In Figures 5(c) and 5(d), the influence of BTO content on the device performance was investigated at a fixed frequency of 1 Hz. The output current and transferred charge both present a maximum value at a 10 wt% BTO content and then decrease with further BTO addition (similar as the voltage tendency in Figure S6). The working mechanism on different BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites are schematically compared in Figure 5(e). Specifically, as the surface potential of BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites is lower than that of Al foil (Figure S7), electrons are transferred from Al to tribomaterials and the transferred electrons (red dots) stored in the trap sites of the sample could induce positive charges (blue dots) on the back Al electrode. Due to the low capacitance and small number of trapping sites, electrons on PVDF-TrFE could diffusion and decrease the induction of positive charges on the bottom electrode, while, in the nanocomposites with high BTO content, the electrons could combine with induced positive charges via a large leakage current. Meanwhile, the exposed BTO NPs on the nanocomposite surface could significantly reduce the transferred electrons from Al friction layer (shown in Figure S8), as the electronegativity of BTO is lower than PVDF-TrFE, which has a tremendous charge-attracting and transfer properties [63].

Based on the above discussion, the dielectric manipulated charge dynamic behavior during contact electrification is proposed and demonstrated in Figure 6. Due to the different electron affinity between the tip/Al and the dielectric sample, electrons will transfer from the tip/Al to the sample during contact electrification, while, in the atmosphere, electrons can be combined with the opposite charges or hydrated ion from the atmosphere, and screened by water moisture. Meanwhile, charge diffusion and drift occurring on the sample can significantly reduce the surface charge density. PVDF-TrFE with low polarization and capacitance has a low ability to trap or sustain electrons, thus leading to a high charge diffusion rate, while the addition of high-k BTO NPs could efficiently improve the capacitance and electron trapping ability of the nanocomposites, as well as the inducibility of positive charges on the back electrode. Otherwise, the nanocomposites with BTO NPs also aggravate the electrons drifting to the back electrode, thus leading to an increase of leakage current and a significant decrease of surface charge density. Hence, in the view of charge generation, charge storage, and charge dissipation, it is essential to increase the electronegativity, capacitance, charge trapping ability, and suppress the leakage current of the tribomaterial for the construction of high-performance triboelectric devices.

3. Conclusions

In summary, an in situ method was demonstrated to characterize the contact electrification and charge dynamics of a metal-dielectric case at nanoscale via the combination of AFM and KPFM. Combined with the characterization of triboelectric device at macroscale, the influence of contact force, friction cycle, and dielectric properties on the contact electrification and charge dynamics were systematically investigated. Results indicate that the contact force is directly proportional to the transferred electrons from the tip/Al to PVDF-TrFE, and the electron density increases and tends to reach saturation with the increasing friction cycles. Due to the low capacitance of PVDF-TrFE, the transferred electrons rapidly diffuse to the adjacent areas, leading to a drastic decrease of electron density at the rubbed area. Significantly, the addition of high-k BTO NPs into a low-k polymer matrix can increase the capacitance and charge trapping capability of the corresponding nanocomposite, leading to an efficient inhibition of electron diffusion on the BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites and an enhancement of output performance of the triboelectric device. However, excessive BTO NPs could intensify the vertical drift of electrons into the bulk and the combination of drifting electrons with induced positive charges on the back electrode, which form a large leakage current, accelerate the dissipation of electrons, and degrade the device performance. Hence, BTO NPs play a dual role in the charge dynamics of the nanocomposites. Overall, this research elucidates the mechanism of dielectric manipulated charge transfer, charge distribution, charge dissipation, and provides perspectives for constructing high-performance triboelectric devices in the future.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Fabrication of the BTO/PVDF-TrFE Nanocomposite Films

The complex BTO/PVDF-TrFE solution was prepared by adding 1 g BTO NPs (average diameter: 200 nm; Shandong Sinocera Functional Materials Co., Ltd., China; characterized in Figure S9) and PVDF-TrFE (molar ratio 8 : 2) into 6 ml N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF; analytical grade; Tansoole (China)). Firstly, BTO were ultrasonically dispersed in DMF for 30 min; then, PVDF-TrFE was dissolved in DMF by stirring for 24 h. The fraction of BTO was prepared at a certain fraction (0-30 wt%) according to the total mass of BTO and PVDF-TrFE. The complex solutions were spin-coated on heavily doped Si substrates (Ω∙cm; Shunsheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., China) at various rotation speeds to achieve a similar film thickness of μm (characterized in Figure S10). The surface roughness of the films increases from 9.27 nm to 50.7 nm with the increasement of BTO content in PVDF-TrFE (characterized in Figure S11). In addition, the BTO/PVDF-TrFE films used for constructing the triboelectric devices were fabricated by bar coating with a thickness of μm. Subsequently, the nanocomposite films were dried at 60°C for 1 h and then annealed at 140°C for 2 h.

4.2. Construction of the Triboelectric Devices

The BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite films were tailored and attached with an Al foil back electrode (), and the friction counterpart was the bare Al foil.

4.3. Characterization and Measurements

The surface morphology of the nanocomposite films was characterized by SEM (Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI, USA). XRD (D/max-2200/PC, Rigaku, Japan) with Cu Kα source was applied to investigate the crystalline structure of the films. The dielectric constant and loss of the nanocomposites were measured by a Novocontrol Alpha-N high-resolution dielectric analyzer (GmbH Concept 40) in the frequency range of 102-106 Hz at room temperature. Polarization-electric field (P-E) loop and leakage current were performed via a Precision Multiferroic Material Analyzer equipped with a Precision 10 kV HVI-SC and Trek MODEL 609B (Radiant Inc.). The isothermal surface potential decay experiments were conducted by corona charging the samples for 10 min under a needle-grid electrode system with the needle and grid voltages of -8 and -2 kV, respectively. The surface potential distributions were recorded with a high-speed electrostatic voltmeter (Trek, Model P0865). All experiments are carried out in an airtight chamber with the temperature and relative humidity keeping constant as ~27°C and~52%. Surface potential and the in situ contact electrification were investigated using an atomic force microscope (AFM, Dimension Icon, Bruker, USA) system under KPFM mode and contact mode, respectively. The measurements were performed under the same ambient conditions for all samples (temperature~25°C, humidity ~50%). Pt-coated Si probe (AC240TM) was produced by OLYMPUS. In contact mode, the normal contact force was calculated from the product of inverse optical lever amplification (112 nm/V), deflection setpoint (0-0.7 V), and spring constant of the tip (2 N/m). The corresponding contact forces related to the setpoints of 0 V, 0.1 V, 0.3 V, 0.5 V, and 0.7 V are 0 nN, 22.4 nN, 67.2 nN, 112 nN, and 156.8 nN, respectively. In KPFM mode, the tapping amplitude was set to be 350 mV, the lift height was 50 nm, and the scan rate was 2 Hz. Film thickness was measured using a profilometer (Alpha-step D-600, USA). The short current of the triboelectric devices mounted on a linear motor was recorded using a source meter (2450, Keithley).

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52103303, 51877132, and 52003153), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M702089), Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (21XD1401600), State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment (EIPE20203 and EIPE21206), and Science and Technology Project of State Grid (SGSHDK00SPJS2100196).

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1: derived peak ΔCPD as a function of deflection setpoint (a) and number of friction cycle (b). Fig. S2: dielectric loss of PVDF-TrFE and BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites. Fig. S3: charge induction on the back electrode for the samples with different electric polarization ability. Fig. S4: the ΔCPD distribution, cross-section profile, and the corresponding distribution width of 40 wt% BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite measured at 0 min. Fig. S5: distribution width of the Gaussian function fitting with the ΔCPD profiles of PVDF-TrFE and BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites measured at 0-12 min. Fig. S6: output voltage of BTO/PVDF-TrFE-based triboelectric devices under 1 Hz, 20 N. Fig. S7: average surface potential of (a) Al foil and (b) BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites. Fig. S8: (a) surface morphology of the BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites. (b) Local surface morphology and potential of the BTO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposite. (c) The potential distribution along the dotted-line in (b). Fig. S9: SEM image and size distribution of BTO nanoparticles. Fig. S10: the thickness of the fabricated sample films. Fig. S11: the surface roughness of the fabricated sample films. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. J. Lowell and A. C. Rose-Innes, “Contact electrification,” Advances in Physics, vol. 29, pp. 947–1023, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. J. Lacks and R. Mohan Sankaran, “Contact electrification of insulating materials,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 44, no. 45, article 453001, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Lin, X. Chen, and Z. L. Wang, “Contact electrification at the liquid-solid interface,” Chemical Reviews, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. Z. L. Wang, “From contact electrification to triboelectric nanogenerators,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 84, pp. 1–68, 2021. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. Willatzen and Z. L. Wang, “Contact electrification by quantum-mechanical tunneling,” Research, vol. 2019, article 6528689, 11 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Zou, Y. Zhang, L. Guo et al., “Quantifying the triboelectric series,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, article 1427, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. B. Schein, Electrophotography and Development Physics, Laplacian, Morgan Hill, CA, 1996.
  8. D. M. Pai and B. E. Springett, “Physics of electrophotography,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 163–211, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. A. Kwetkus, “Particle triboelectrification and its use in the electrostatic separation process, Particul,” Science and Technology, vol. 16, pp. 55–68, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. G. Bailey, “The science and technology of electrostatic powder spraying, transport and coating,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 45, pp. 85–120, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Zhang, W. Tang, L. Zhang, C. Han, and Z. L. Wang, “Contact electrification field-effect transistor,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, pp. 8702–8709, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Zheng, F. Yang, J. Guo et al., “Cd(OH)2@ZnO nanowires thin-film transistor and UV photodetector with a floating ionic gate tuned by a triboelectric nanogenerator,” Nano Energy, vol. 73, article 104808, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Yang, M. Zheng, L. Zhao et al., “The high-speed ultraviolet photodetector of ZnO nanowire Schottky barrier based on the triboelectric-nanogenerator-powered surface-ionic-gate,” Nano Energy, vol. 60, pp. 680–688, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. L. Wang, “Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology and self-powered sensors - principles, problems and perspectives,” Faraday Discussions, vol. 176, pp. 447–458, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. Wu, A. C. Wang, W. Ding, H. Guo, and Z. L. Wang, “Triboelectric nanogenerator: a foundation of the energy for the new era,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 9, article 1802906, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Ji, Y. Liu, and Y. Yang, “Multieffect coupled nanogenerators,” Research, vol. 2020, article 6503157, 24 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Z. L. Wang, J. Chen, and L. Lin, “Progress in triboelectric nanogenerators as a new energy technology and self-powered sensors,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 8, pp. 2250–2282, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. Yu, Y. Zhu, W. Wang, and J. Zhai, “Progress in triboelectric materials: toward high performance and widespread applications,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 29, article 1900098, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Liu, L. Gu, N. Cui, Q. Xu, Y. Qin, and R. Yang, “Fabric-based triboelectric nanogenerators,” Research, vol. 2019, article 1091632, 13 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. Zhang, G. Gu, W. Shang et al., “A general charge compensation strategy for calibrating the voltage of a triboelectric nanogenerator measured by a capacitive circuit,” Nano Energy, vol. 86, article 106056, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W. Zhang, G. Gu, H. Qin et al., “Measuring the actual voltage of a triboelectric nanogenerator using the non- grounded method,” Nano Energy, vol. 77, article 105108, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Wang, C. Wu, Y. Dai et al., “Achieving ultrahigh triboelectric charge density for efficient energy harvesting,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. Chen, Q. Shi, Y. Sun, T. Nguyen, C. Lee, and S. Soh, “Controlling surface charge generated by contact electrification: strategies and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 30, p. 1802405, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. L. Wang, Z. H. Guo, G. Zhu, X. Pu, and Z. L. Wang, “Boosting the power and lowering the impedance of triboelectric nanogenerators through manipulating the permittivity for wearable energy harvesting,” ACS Nano, vol. 15, pp. 7513–7521, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Kim, J. Ha, and J.-B. Kim, “Theoretical study on the dielectric effect on triboelectric nanogenerators,” Integrated Ferroelectrics, vol. 176, pp. 283–290, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Niu and Z. L. Wang, “Theoretical systems of triboelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 14, pp. 161–192, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. S. Choi, S. W. Kim, and S. Kar-Narayan, “Materials-related strategies for highly efficient triboelectric energy generators,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 11, article 2003802, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Kim, H. Ryu, J. H. Lee et al., “High permittivity CaCu3Ti4O12Particle‐Induced internal polarization amplification for high performance triboelectric nanogenerators,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 10, no. 9, article 1903524, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Shi, H. Zou, B. Sun, P. Jiang, J. He, and X. Huang, “Dielectric modulated cellulose paper/PDMS-based triboelectric nanogenerators for wireless transmission and electropolymerization applications,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, article 1904536, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Tong, Q. An, Z. Wang et al., “Enhanced electricity generation and tunable preservation in porous polymeric materials via coupled piezoelectric and dielectric processes,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 39, article 2003087, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Chen, H. Guo, X. He et al., “Enhancing performance of triboelectric nanogenerator by filling high dielectric nanoparticles into sponge PDMS film,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, pp. 736–744, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. S. Zhou, Y. Liu, G. Zhu et al., “In situ quantitative study of nanoscale triboelectrification and patterning,” Nano Letters, vol. 13, pp. 2771–2776, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. Binnig, C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber, “Atomic force microscope,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 56, pp. 930–933, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Lin, L. Xu, W. Tang, X. Chen, and Z. L. Wang, “Electron transfer in nano-scale contact electrification: atmosphere effect on the surface states of dielectrics,” Nano Energy, vol. 65, article 103956, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Q. Lin and T. M. Shao, “Bipolar charge transfer induced by water: experimental and first-principles studies,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 19, pp. 29418–29423, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  36. W. Melitz, J. Shen, A. C. Kummel, and S. Lee, “Kelvin probe force microscopy and its application,” Surface Science Reports, vol. 66, pp. 1–27, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Sun, H. Chu, J. Wang, L. Ding, and Y. Li, “Kelvin probe force microscopy study on nanotriboelectrification,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, article 083112, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. G. Min, Y. Xu, P. Cochran, N. Gadegaard, D. M. Mulvihill, and R. Dahiya, “Origin of the contact force-dependent response of triboelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 83, article 105829, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. B. Shi, X. Gan, C. Zhang et al., “Investigating the effect of nanoscale triboelectrification on nanofriction in insulators,” Nano Energy, vol. 91, article 106620, 2022. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. Xia, H. Wang, H. Guo, C. Xu, and Y. Zi, “On the material-dependent charge transfer mechanism of the contact electrification,” Nano Energy, vol. 78, article 105343, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. Xu, B. Zhang, A. C. Wang et al., “Effects of metal work function and contact potential difference on electron thermionic emission in contact electrification,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 29, article 1903142, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. Xu, Y. Zi, A. C. Wang et al., “On the electron-transfer mechanism in the contact-electrification effect,” Advanced Materials, vol. 30, no. 15, article 1706790, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Lin, C. Xu, L. Xu, and Z. L. Wang, “The overlapped electron-cloud model for electron transfer in contact electrification,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 30, article 1909724, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. N. Knorr, S. Rosselli, and G. Nelles, “Surface-potential decay of biased-probe contact-charged amorphous polymer films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, article 054106, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. W. Lee, H. J. Cho, J. Chun et al., “Robust nanogenerators based on graft copolymers via control of dielectrics for remarkable output power enhancement,” Science Advances, vol. 3, article 1602902, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. P. Kim, Y. Lee, Y. H. Hur et al., “Molecular structure engineering of dielectric fluorinated polymers for enhanced performances of triboelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 53, pp. 37–45, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Zhang, B.-W. Li, L. Dong et al., “Superior energy storage performances of polymer nanocomposites via modification of filler/polymer interfaces,” Advanced Materials Interfaces, vol. 5, article 1800096, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. H. Li, L. Wang, Y. Zhu, P. Jiang, and X. Huang, “Tailoring the polarity of polymer shell on BaTiO3 nanoparticle surface for improved energy storage performance of dielectric polymer nanocomposites,” Chinese Chemical Letters, vol. 32, pp. 2229–2232, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. X. Huang, B. Sun, Y. Zhu, S. Li, and P. Jiang, “High-k polymer nanocomposites with 1D filler for dielectric and energy storage applications,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 100, pp. 187–225, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. Shi, B. Chai, H. Zou et al., “Interface induced performance enhancement in flexible BaTiO3/PVDF-TrFE based piezoelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 80, article 105515, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. N. Cui, L. Gu, Y. Lei et al., “Dynamic behavior of the triboelectric charges and structural optimization of the friction layer for a triboelectric nanogenerator,” ACS Nano, vol. 10, pp. 6131–6138, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Sohn, J. H. Lee, H.-J. Yoon, H. H. Lee, and S.-W. Kim, “Self-boosted power generation of triboelectric nanogenerator with glass transition by friction heat,” Nano Energy, vol. 74, article 104840, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. Y. Park, Y.-E. Shin, J. Park et al., “Ferroelectric multilayer nanocomposites with polarization and stress concentration structures for enhanced triboelectric performances,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, pp. 7101–7110, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. X. Xie, X. Chen, C. Zhao et al., “Intermediate layer for enhanced triboelectric nanogenerator,” Nano Energy, vol. 79, article 105439, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Li, F. Zhou, D. Min, S. Li, and R. Xia, “The energy distribution of trapped charges in polymers based on isothermal surface potential decay model,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 22, pp. 1723–1732, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. W.-W. Shen, H.-B. Mu, G.-J. Zhang, J.-B. Deng, and D.-M. Tu, “Identification of electron and hole trap based on isothermal surface potential decay model,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 113, article 083706, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Lin, L. Xu, C. Xu et al., “Electron transfer in nanoscale contact electrification: effect of temperature in the metal-dielectric case,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, p. 1808197, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Lin, L. Xu, L. Zhu, X. Chen, and Z. L. Wang, “Electron transfer in nanoscale contact electrification: photon excitation effect,” Advanced Materials, vol. 31, article 1901418, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. P. Molinié, “Measuring and modeling transient insulator response to charging: the contribution of surface potential studies,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, vol. 12, pp. 939–950, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. W. Kim, J. H. Lee, I. You, J. K. Kim, and U. Jeong, “Adding a stretchable deep-trap interlayer for high-performance stretchable triboelectric nanogenerators,” Nano Energy, vol. 50, pp. 192–200, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. B. Yang, W. Zeng, Z.-H. Peng, S.-R. Liu, K. Chen, and X.-M. Tao, “A fully verified theoretical analysis of contact-mode triboelectric nanogenerators as a wearable power source,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 6, article 1600505, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. M. S. Rana, M. A. Zahed, M. T. Rahman et al., “Cobalt-nanoporous carbon functionalized nanocomposite-based triboelectric nanogenerator for contactless and sustainable self-powered sensor systems,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 31, no. 52, article 2105110, 2021. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. W. Seung, H.-J. Yoon, T. Y. Kim et al., “Boosting power-generating performance of triboelectric nanogenerators via artificial control of ferroelectric polarization and dielectric properties,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 7, article 1600988, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2022 Kunming Shi et al. Exclusive Licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).

 PDF Download Citation Citation
Views226
Downloads363
Altmetric Score
Citations